Document Detail


Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17943848     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Root canal treatment (RoCT), or endodontic treatment, is a common procedure in dentistry. The main indications for RoCT are irreversible pulpitis and necrosis of the dental pulp caused by carious processes, tooth cracks or chips, or dental trauma. Successful RoCT is characterised by an absence of symptoms and clinical signs in teeth without radiographic evidence of periodontal involvement. The success of RoCT depends on a series of variables related to the preoperative condition of the tooth, as well as the endodontic procedures.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of single- and multiple-visit RoCT, measured as tooth extraction due to endodontic problems and radiological success.To assess the difference in short- and long-term complications between single- and multiple-visit RoCT.
SEARCH STRATEGY: The following databases were searched for relevant trials: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Handsearching was performed for the major oral medicine journals. References of included studies and reviews were checked. Endodontics experts were contacted through e-mail. No language limitations were imposed. Date of last search was 6th March 2007.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of patients needing RoCT were included. Surgical endodontic treatment was excluded. The outcomes considered were the number of teeth extracted for endodontic problems; radiological success after at least 1 year, that is, absence of any periapical radiolucency; postoperative pain; painkiller use; swelling; or sinus track formation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected using a specific extraction form. The validity of included studies was assessed on the basis of allocation concealment, blindness of the study, and loss of participants. Data were analysed by calculating risk ratios. When valid and relevant data were collected, a meta-analysis of the data was undertaken.
MAIN RESULTS: Twelve randomised controlled trials were included in the review. Four studies had a low risk of bias, four a moderate risk, and another four had a high risk of bias. The frequency of radiological success and immediate postoperative pain were not significantly different between single- and multiple-visit RoCT. Patients undergoing single-visit RoCT reported a higher frequency of painkiller use and swelling, but the results for swelling were not significantly different between the two groups. We found no study that included tooth loss and sinus track formation among its primary outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No difference exists in the effectiveness of RoCT, in terms of radiological success, between single- and multiple-visit RoCT. Most short- and long-term complications are also similar in terms of frequency, although patients undergoing a single visit may experience a slightly higher frequency of swelling and are significatively more likely to take painkillers.
Authors:
L Figini; G Lodi; F Gorni; M Gagliani
Related Documents :
20419648 - Epidemiological surveillance of bluetongue in sicily.
11965278 - Quantification of the completeness of follow-up.
11515928 - Limitations of randomized clinical trials for evaluating emerging operations: the case ...
18631428 - Examining the evidence: complementary adjunctive therapies for multiple sclerosis.
20230418 - Out of hospital treatment of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a low nt-probnp ...
21085018 - The safety and effectiveness of a chloroform/methanol extract of tripterygium wilfordii...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Review     Date:  2007-10-17
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Cochrane database of systematic reviews     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1469-493X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Publication Date:  2007  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-10-18     Completed Date:  2008-01-17     Revised Date:  2013-06-28    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100909747     Medline TA:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  CD005296     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Analgesics / therapeutic use*
Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
Appointments and Schedules
Dental Pulp Necrosis / radiography,  therapy*
Dentition, Permanent*
Humans
Office Visits / utilization*
Pulpitis / radiography,  therapy*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Root Canal Therapy / adverse effects,  methods*
Tooth Extraction
Treatment Outcome
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Analgesics; 0/Anti-Bacterial Agents
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Evid Based Dent. 2008;9(1):24   [PMID:  18364693 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Chinese herbal medicine for primary dysmenorrhoea.
Next Document:  Bisphosphonate therapy for children and adolescents with secondary osteoporosis.