Document Detail


Single and multiple respiratory virus infections and severity of respiratory disease: A systematic review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24361079     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: There are suggestions that virus co-infections may influence the clinical outcome of respiratory virus illness. We performed a systematic review of the literature to summarise the evidence.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid and WEB of Science databases, major organisation websites and reference lists of published studies were searched. The quality of studies was assessed using the STROBE tool (von Elm et al., 1) Individual study data was analyzed using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals as a measure of association between exposure (co-infection), patient outcome and results summarised using forest plots and tables RESULTS: Nineteen (19) studies from all over the world were identified and included in the review. Most of the studies 73.7% (14/19) recruited children ≤6 years old. Evidence on the role of co-infection in increasing disease severity was inconclusive. In five out of eight studies, co-infection significantly increased risk of admission to general ward (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3 - 4.4, p = 0.005; OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1 - 7.7, P = 0.04; OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 2.0 - 5.1, p = <0.001; OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7-3.4, p = <0.0001 and OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1 - 5.1, p = 0.34), one found it did not (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.4 - 0.9, p = 0.02) and the other 2 had insignificant results. Similarly on risk of admission to ICU, some studies found that co-infection significantly increased risk of admission to ICU (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4 - 5.9, p = 0.004 and OR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.7 - 5.6, p = <0.0001), whereas others did not (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05 - 0.75, p = 0.02 and OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 - 0.6, p = <0.0001). There was no evidence for or against respiratory virus co-infections and risk of bronchiolitis or pneumonia.
CONCLUSION: The influence of co-infections on severe viral respiratory disease is still unclear. The observed conflict in outcomes could be because they were conducted in different seasons and covered different years and periods. It could also be due to bias towards the null, especially in studies where only crude analysis was conducted. Future studies should employ stratified analysis.
Authors:
Edward Anthony Goka; Pamela J Vallely; Kenneth J Mutton; Paul E Klapper
Related Documents :
24413719 - Usefulness of serum procalcitonin level for prediction of vesicoureteral reflux in pedi...
23866529 - Urinary tract infection presenting as jaundice in neonates.
24650919 - Gene polymorphisms in ccr5, ccr2, sdf1 and rantes among chinese han population with hiv...
23878009 - Implant-associated localized osteitis in murine femur fracture by biofilm forming staph...
24865759 - Evaluation of dedicated infectious diseases pharmacists on antimicrobial stewardship te...
25370419 - Simultaneous sinus and lung infections in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia.
15587409 - Experimental study on the antibacterial effect of origanum volatile oil on dysentery ba...
2114369 - Infections after auxiliary partial liver transplantation. experiences in the first ten ...
16821779 - Activity of and initial mechanistic studies on a novel antileishmanial agent identified...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-11-16
Journal Detail:
Title:  Paediatric respiratory reviews     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1526-0550     ISO Abbreviation:  Paediatr Respir Rev     Publication Date:  2013 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-12-23     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100898941     Medline TA:  Paediatr Respir Rev     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Olfactory Receptor and Neural Pathway Responsible for Highly Selective Sensing of Musk Odors.
Next Document:  Present state of Japanese cedar pollinosis: The national affliction.