Document Detail

Sildenafil versus continuous positive airway pressure for erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnea: a comparative study of their efficacy and safety and the patient's satisfaction with treatment.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17334593     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
AIM: To assess the efficacy of sildenafil and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the treatment of concurrent erectile dysfunction (ED) with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and to gauge the level of treatment satisfaction in patients and their partners. METHODS: Forty men were treated for 12 weeks with sildenafil 100 mg (20 men) or CPAP during nighttime sleep (20 men). Treatment efficacy was assessed by the rate of successful intercourse attempts, and satisfaction with treatment was assessed by patients' and partners' answers to question 1 of the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction. RESULTS: Under sildenafil, 128 of 249 (51.4%) intercourse attempts were successful; under CPAP, 51 of 193 (26.9%) attempts were successful ((c)P < 0.001). Erectile function was improved in both groups. After sildenafil and CPAP treatment, the mean International Index for Erectile Function domain scores were 14.3 and 10.8, respectively ((b)P = 0.025), compared to 7.8 and 7 at baseline, respectively. CPAP and sildenafil were well tolerated. Sporadic episodes of nasal dryness under CPAP and transient headache and flushing under sildenafil were not significant. Fifty percent of patients treated with sildenafil and 25% with CPAP were satisfied with the treatment, and their partners were equally satisfied. The satisfaction scores for both patients and partners under sildenafil were superior to those under CPAP ((c)P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: Both sildenafil 100 mg and CPAP, used separately, had positive therapeutic impact but sildenafil was superior. Patients and their partners were more satisfied with sildenafil for the treatment of ED. However, because of the high proportion of dissatisfied men and partners, new therapeutic agents or a combination of the two methods must be studied further.
Petros Perimenis; Kyriakos Karkoulias; Angelis Konstantinopoulos; Paraskevi P Perimeni; George Katsenis; Anastasios Athanasopoulos; Konstantinos Spyropoulos
Related Documents :
24112493 - Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary surgery throu...
19200793 - Effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on an accelerated rate of mandibular distraction o...
20562073 - Immediate and long-term outcome of multiple percutaneous interventions in patients with...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Asian journal of andrology     Volume:  9     ISSN:  1008-682X     ISO Abbreviation:  Asian J. Androl.     Publication Date:  2007 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-03-05     Completed Date:  2007-05-16     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100942132     Medline TA:  Asian J Androl     Country:  China    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  259-64     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, 26500 Rio, Patras, Greece.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure*
Erectile Dysfunction / drug therapy,  etiology,  therapy*
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Piperazines / therapeutic use*
Purines / therapeutic use
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive / complications,  therapy*
Sulfones / therapeutic use*
Treatment Outcome
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Piperazines; 0/Purines; 0/Sulfones; 139755-83-2/sildenafil

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Long-term effectiveness of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antiandrogen monotherapy...
Next Document:  Seminal plasma anti-Müllerian hormone level correlates with semen parameters but does not predict s...