Document Detail


Shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized, double-blind trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19896176     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To present a randomized trial investigating immediate vs delayed voltage escalation during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). SWL efficiency is affected by the energy setting of the lithotripter, the consumption level of the electrode, and the rate of shock wave administration. Preliminary data have suggested that delaying voltage escalation for SWL might both improve fragmentation and minimize renal injury. METHODS: A total of 160 patients with previously untreated radiopaque renal calculi were randomized to undergo immediate vs delayed voltage escalation SWL. Success was defined as an asymptomatic patient who was stone free or had adequate fragmentation (sand or fragments < or = 4 mm) at 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 160 patients, 83 were treated with immediate voltage escalation SWL and 77 patients with delayed escalation. The groups were similar in sex, body mass index, stone area, and stone location. The overall success rate at 3 months was 72.5% for immediate vs 54.5% for delayed SWL (P = .021). After adjusting for body mass index, sex, and stone location, the stone area decreased more rapidly in patients treated with immediate voltage escalation (P = .002). A trend was also seen for immediate voltage escalation to be more effective in the treatment of smaller calculi with a cross-sectional area of < 100 mm(2) (P = .089) compared with calculi with a cross-sectional area of > or = 100 mm(2) (P = .248). No differences were seen in the complications or ancillary procedures between the 2 treatments (P = .667 and P = .355, respectively). No perinephric hematomas were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that delayed voltage escalation might not provide superior stone fragmentation compared with conventional, immediate voltage escalation.
Authors:
R John D'A Honey; A Andrew Ray; Daniela Ghiculete; ; Kenneth T Pace
Related Documents :
18613776 - Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones.
20425096 - Adjuncts to improve outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy.
21873356 - A randomized trial of aprotinin-free fibrin sealant versus absorbable hemostat.
12629336 - Clinical efficacy of a combination pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotrite.
21470746 - Are maxillomandibular fixation screws a better option than erich arch bars in achieving...
22243626 - Wild bitter gourd improves metabolic syndrome: a preliminary dietary supplementation tr...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial     Date:  2009-11-06
Journal Detail:
Title:  Urology     Volume:  75     ISSN:  1527-9995     ISO Abbreviation:  Urology     Publication Date:  2010 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-01-29     Completed Date:  2010-02-22     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0366151     Medline TA:  Urology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  38-43     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Urology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. honeyj@smh.toronto.on.ca
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Double-Blind Method
Electricity
Female
Humans
Kidney Calculi / therapy*
Lithotripsy / methods*
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Urology. 2010 Jan;75(1):43-4; author reply 44   [PMID:  20109703 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  An alternative minimally invasive technique for large prostates (>80 mL): transvesical prostatectomy...
Next Document:  Priapism and Penile Gangrene Due to Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.