Document Detail


Setting priorities for improving the preoperative assessment clinic: the patients' and the professionals' perspective.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18238838     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The quality of the preoperative assessment clinic (PAC) is determined by many factors. Patients' experiences are important indicators, but often overlooked. We prepare to set priorities to improve the PAC by obtaining detailed patients' feedback on the quality of the PAC, and establishing the value patients and professionals attach to different care aspects, using the Patient Experiences with the Preoperative Assessment Clinic questionnaire. METHODS: The PAC's standard of service was determined for five care aspects (dimensions), using patients' feedback. The importance of a dimension to patients was determined by calculating the effects of the dimensions on patients' overall appraisal. In addition, professionals were asked to rate the importance of the different care aspects. RESULTS: Patients had the most positive experiences with the nurse, and the least positive experiences with waiting. However, waiting was least important to patients. When combining the PAC's standard of service with the value given to the dimensions by patients and professionals separately, we found in both instances that waiting was in greatest need of improvement. This was followed by reception, the anaesthetist, remaining experiences, and finally the nurse. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement of the PAC can be achieved by obtaining patients' feedback on the quality, determine a PAC's standard of service, recognize service areas that require improvement, and identify actions appropriate to bring about improvement. The value patients and professionals attach to different aspects of care can then be used to prioritize improvements.
Authors:
G M Edward; J C J M de Haes; F J Oort; L C Lemaire; M W Hollmann; B Preckel
Related Documents :
21527788 - Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fmri 48 h poststroke.
17964008 - Three month intervention with protein and energy rich supplements improve muscle functi...
20471238 - Assessing dyspnea and its impact on patients with connective tissue disease-related int...
623718 - Assessing the psychological effects of an exercise training programme for patients foll...
483138 - Scintiscans in the evaluation of patients with malignant melanomas.
11571498 - Impaired phospholipid-related signal transduction in advanced huntington's disease.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2008-01-31
Journal Detail:
Title:  British journal of anaesthesia     Volume:  100     ISSN:  1471-6771     ISO Abbreviation:  Br J Anaesth     Publication Date:  2008 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-02-15     Completed Date:  2008-03-24     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372541     Medline TA:  Br J Anaesth     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  322-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesiology / standards*
Attitude of Health Personnel
Female
Health Priorities
Health Services Research
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / standards*
Patient Satisfaction*
Preoperative Care / standards*
Quality of Health Care*
Questionnaires

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Inflammation-induced up-regulation of ionotropic glutamate receptor expression in human skin.
Next Document:  Human factors in anaesthetic practice: insights from a task analysis.