Document Detail


Sedation in a radiology department - do radiologists follow their own guidelines?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21670128     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) published guidelines in 2003 which aimed to standardise and improve the safety of sedation in the modern Radiology department. As sedation requirements increase, we decided to audit our own departments understandings and practice with respect to sedation. A repeat audit cycle was performed following a re-educational lecture, one year later. Three common sedation case scenarios were incorporated into a questionnaire which detailed questioning on requirements for fasting, monitoring and the order and use of sedation drugs alongside analgesics. These were compared to the 2003 RCR guidelines. The audit was recycled at one year. Despite the RCR guidelines, freely available on the RCR website, there was a persisting variation in practice which revealed a lack of awareness of the requirements for adequate fasting and the importance of giving the opiate before the benzodiazepine (sedative) agent in cases where a combination are chosen. The audit did show a trend towards using shorter acting benzodiazepines, which is in keeping with the guidelines. Monitoring of vital signs was generally, well carried out. General awareness of the RCR guidelines for safe sedation in the Radiology department was initially low and practice found to be variable. Re-education saw some improvements but also, some persisting habitual deviations from the guidelines, particularly with respect to the order in which the opiate and sedative benzodiazepine were given.
Authors:
D Eason; S Chakraverty; J A W Wildsmith
Related Documents :
12576558 - Fitness standards in airline staff.
2133938 - Current trends in behavior management techniques as they relate to new standards concer...
12004638 - Developing professional judgment.
19423678 - Why look at an spc?
11618748 - The first career of william alexander hammond.
20045238 - Nephrologists' perspectives on the effect of guidelines on clinical practice: a semistr...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Scottish medical journal     Volume:  56     ISSN:  0036-9330     ISO Abbreviation:  Scott Med J     Publication Date:  2011 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-06-14     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2983335R     Medline TA:  Scott Med J     Country:  Scotland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  61-3     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Radiology.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Peripheral kisspeptin reverses short photoperiod-induced gonadal regression in Syrian hamsters by pr...
Next Document:  The evolution of laparoscopic antireflux surgery and its influence on postoperative stay.