Document Detail

Screening of selected ethnomedicinal plants from South Africa for larvicidal activity against the mosquito Anopheles arabiensis.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22963538     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: This study was initiated to establish whether any South African ethnomedicinal plants (indigenous or exotic), that have been reported to be used traditionally to repel or kill mosquitoes, exhibit effective mosquito larvicidal properties.
METHODS: Extracts of a selection of plant taxa sourced in South Africa were tested for larvicidal properties in an applicable assay. Thirty 3rd instar Anopheles arabiensis larvae were exposed to various extract types (dichloromethane, dichloromethane/methanol) (1:1), methanol and purified water) of each species investigated. Mortality was evaluated relative to the positive control Temephos (Mostop; Agrivo), an effective emulsifiable concentrate larvicide.
RESULTS: Preliminary screening of crude extracts revealed substantial variation in toxicity with 24 of the 381 samples displaying 100% larval mortality within the seven day exposure period. Four of the high activity plants were selected and subjected to bioassay guided fractionation. The results of the testing of the fractions generated identified one fraction of the plant, Toddalia asiatica as being very potent against the An. arabiensis larvae.
CONCLUSION: The present study has successfully identified a plant with superior larvicidal activity at both the crude and semi pure fractions generated through bio-assay guided fractionation. These results have initiated further research into isolating the active compound and developing a malaria vector control tool.
Authors:
Rajendra Maharaj; Vinesh Maharaj; Neil R Crouch; Niresh Bhagwandin; Peter I Folb; Pamisha Pillay; Reshma Gayaram
Related Documents :
18623078 - Phytotoxic effects of cyanobacteria extract on lemna minor and myriophyllum spicatum ph...
20852918 - Two cotton cys2/his2-type zinc-finger proteins, ghdi19-1 and ghdi19-2, are involved in ...
21539418 - Variation within and between frankliniella thrips species in host plant utilization.
21539268 - Effect of different potting systems; inoculation time; nematode density and sources of ...
23949678 - Fruits of mimosa foliolosa (fabales: fabaceae) as sleeping shelter for megachile (pseud...
24184548 - Ozone inactivation of infectious prions in rendering plant and municipal wastewaters.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2012-09-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  Malaria journal     Volume:  11     ISSN:  1475-2875     ISO Abbreviation:  Malar. J.     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-16     Completed Date:  2013-01-30     Revised Date:  2013-07-11    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101139802     Medline TA:  Malar J     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  320     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
South African Medical Research Council, 491 Ridge Road, Overport, Durban 4001, South Africa. rmaharaj@mrc.ac.za
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animals
Anopheles / drug effects*
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical / methods
Humans
Insecticides / isolation & purification*,  pharmacology*
Larva / drug effects
Plant Extracts / isolation & purification*,  pharmacology*
Plants, Medicinal / chemistry*
Rutaceae / chemistry*
South Africa
Survival Analysis
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Insecticides; 0/Plant Extracts
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Malar J
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Malar. J
ISSN: 1475-2875
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright ©2012 Maharaj et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
open-access:
Received Day: 25 Month: 6 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 28 Month: 8 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 10 Month: 9 Year: 2012
Volume: 11First Page: 320 Last Page: 320
ID: 3472289
Publisher Id: 1475-2875-11-320
PubMed Id: 22963538
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-320

Screening of selected ethnomedicinal plants from South Africa for larvicidal activity against the mosquito Anopheles arabiensis
Rajendra Maharaj1 Email: rmaharaj@mrc.ac.za
Vinesh Maharaj2 Email: VMaharaj@csir.co.za
Neil R Crouch3 Email: n.crouch@sanbi.org.za
Niresh Bhagwandin4 Email: niresh.bhagwandin@mrc.ac.za
Peter I Folb4 Email: pfolb@mrc.ac.za
Pamisha Pillay2 Email: ppillay@csir.co.za
Reshma Gayaram1 Email: rgayaram@mrc.ac.za
1South African Medical Research Council, 491 Ridge Road, Overport, Durban, 4001, South Africa
2Biosciences, CSIR, P.O.Box 395, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
3Ethnobotany Unit, South African National Biodiversity Institute, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, PO Box 52099, Berea Road 4007, Durban, 4041, South Africa
4South African Medical Research Council, P.O.Box19070, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa

Background

Malaria remains one of the highest priority insect transmitted diseases around the world, with Africa carrying the greatest burden. The Anopheles arabiensis mosquito is considered one of the major vectors of malaria in southern Africa with Anopheles funestus the next most important [1].

Within South Africa, malaria affects five million people in the low and high risk areas of the country [2] with the threat concentrated in Mpumalanga, Limpopo and (north-eastern) KwaZulu Natal provinces [3]. According to the strategic plan for communicable diseases in South Africa, one of the main objectives is addressing malaria, to reduce the incidence of local transmission from 0.7 to 0.56 cases per thousand. Strategies employed include indoor spraying, definitive diagnosis of malaria cases and effective case management [4]. The malaria control strategy in South Africa has a two-pronged approach, targeting the malaria parasite with anti-malarial drugs and controlling the vector through the use of insecticides, targeting both larval and adult life stages [5].

Historically, the use of synthetic insecticides has been very effective in reducing malaria transmission. However, over time success has been hampered by the development of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Resistance to pyrethroids [6] and DDT [7] has been reported, and the potential for carbamate resistance has been detected in An. arabiensis, in northern Kwazulu-Natal [8].

The effective alternative insecticides that are currently available are up to six times more expensive than those (DDT and pyrethroids) used previously in regional malaria control programmes and accordingly are not cost effective for indoor residual spraying [9].

As most mosquito breeding sites are temporary habitats, the use of larvicides by malaria control programmes has been very limited. Larvicidal applications have however been favoured mainly in tourist destinations to limit mosquito populations. This form of vector control has been used as a complementary strategy to indoor residual spraying (for adult stages) and has been suggested as a method for eliminating over-wintering larval populations [10,11].

Since insecticide resistance threatens to contribute towards the reintroduction of malaria in many parts of South Africa, efforts have focussed on finding an alternative form of mosquito control. For new interventions to be integrated into most malaria control programmes, they should necessarily be cost effective, practical and accessible.

The concept of screening plant extracts for larvicidal activity is not new. The insecticide pyrethroid was derived from flowers of the asteraceous Tanacetum cinerariifolium (= Chrysanthemum cinerariifolium, the Dalmatian chrysanthemum or pyrethrum daisy) [12]. Production of such constituents has been interpreted as a means by which plants protect themselves from harmful insect herbivores. The notion of using such plant extracts to control mosquito larvae has received widespread research attention, with plants from various countries tested for larvicidal activity [13-16]. Such plant extracts have been investigated for their ability to kill a number of mosquito species known to be malaria vectors [14,17-19].

The efficacy of different plant parts has been well established [16,20,21]. The flower [22], leaf and seed [21], fruits and roots [23,24] have all been investigated for their larvicidal properties, revealing variably useful leads for the development of practical interventions.

Although a small number of studies have investigated larvicidal activity of plant extracts against Anopheles stephensi[25,26] there are limited data regarding the testing of plant extracts against An. arabiensis. Zarroug et al.[27] tested some Sudanese plant extracts against An. arabiensis larvae and obtained significant mortality in second and fourth instar larvae when using water extracts of Balanites aegyptiaca.

In the present study, 381 crude plant extracts were investigated for their larvicidal effect on An. arabiensis, and plants exhibiting promising results during screening were selected for further phytochemical investigation. The extracts consisted of plants found native or naturalized in southern Africa.


Methods
Selection and collection of plant material

A survey of relevant published literature on ethnomedicinal plants used in East and southern Africa revealed that a number of taxa have been reported to be used as mosquito repellents, or to repel or kill other invertebrates. However, given the limited quantity of documented data available, it was decided to not make a distinction between insect repellents and insecticides (both larva- and adulticides), but rather to consider a pool of plants with anti-insect activity.

In order to select the most relevant taxa for screening, all were ranked following the application of weighted criteria, principally ethnobotanical and chemotaxonomic (including such elements as popularity in ethnomedicinal trade, reports on insecticidal and/or mosquitocidal application, reports on insect and/or mosquito repellent application, and the known presence and diversity of repellent/insecticidal constituents in the family to which it belongs). Higher weighting was provided to plants indigenous to the Flora of Southern Africa region (FSA). A similar semi-quantitative selection method has previously been applied to identify and rank both anti-plasmodial [28], mosquito repellent [29] and adulticidal plant [30] candidates from South Africa. From the ranked list selected plants were collected throughout South Africa. Different plant parts, namely, leaves, roots, stems, fruits, flowers, seeds, twigs and bark, and combinations of the above were sourced to generate extracts. In some instances, extracts were made of the whole plant. The plant organ(s) selected for extract preparation were based largely on availability at the time of collection.

The identity of plant material was determined at the National Herbarium of South Africa (PRE) where voucher specimens (cited in Additional file 1: Table S1) have been lodged.

Extract preparation

Plant samples were separated into different components and dried in an oven at 30–60°C. The drying time and temperature varied depending on the nature of the plant part. Dried plant material was ground to a coarse powder using a hammer mill and stored at ambient temperature prior to extraction. For each extraction procedure, 100–500 g of powdered plant material was sequentially extracted, with cold dichloromethane (DCM), DCM/methanol (MeOH) (1:1), MeOH (CP Grade; Merck) and purified water. Organic extracts were concentrated by rotary vacuum evaporation below 45°C and then further dried in vacuo at ambient temperature for 24 h. The aqueous extracts were concentrated by freeze-drying. All dried extracts were stored at −20°C.

Crude plant samples were dissolved in either acetone (AR Grade; Merck) or distilled water depending on their initial extraction procedure, thus forming a 10 mg/ml solution. Dichloromethane and dichloromethane/methanol extracts were reconstituted in acetone whereas aqueous extracts were made up using distilled water.

Larvicidal screening

A 1 ml volume of the extract stock solution was added to a vessel containing thirty 3rd instar mosquito larvae in 0.25 litres of distilled water, producing a final concentration of 40 mg/l. The target species had been a colonized strain of An. arabiensis from Zimbabwe, which had been reared according to the World Health Organization’s [31] guidelines in an insectary simulating the temperature, humidity and lighting of a malaria endemic environment. The negative control trials included either acetone or distilled water, whilst the positive control temephos (Mostop; Agrivo), an effective larvicide was tested at a concentration of 0.2 mg/l.

Each container was monitored for larval mortality at 24-hour intervals for a period of seven days and fed at regular intervals. The percentage mortality was calculated relative to the negative control.


Results and discussion

A total of 80 taxa from 42 families of plants native to or naturalized in southern Africa have been screened for activity against the 3rd instar larvae of An. arabiensis. The third stage of larvae had been used to determine if the extracts had induced any growth inhibition or abnormalities in ecdysis to 4th instar and pupation. Significant events had included failed or delayed transition relative to negative control. The results of primary screening have been presented alphabetically by family, genus and species and thereafter in descending order of mortality over a period of seven days (Cited in Additional file 1: Table S1). In order to assess the biological activity of each extract, all samples were subjected to stringent criteria to identify plants that exhibited larvicidal properties. Any plant with activity of more than 80% mortality was considered significant for further investigation [32]. However, it must be borne in mind that assays were conducted primarily using the crude plant extract.

The results of preliminary screening of 381 plant extracts against the third instar larvae revealed substantial variation in toxicity, differing with plant species, organ, and extraction type. Whilst a substantial number of plants showed moderate to low toxic effects, almost 11% (24 extracts) of the total samples possessed good larvicidal properties relative to the positive control. In an earlier study, Maharaj et al.[30] screened crude extracts of many of the same plant species here reported on, for adulticidal properties. Very limited adulticidal activities were observed, indicating a much greater susceptibility of larvae to the same extracts. The toxicity of the highly active positive control sample had exhibited 100% mortality within 24 hours of exposure, whilst both negative control tests indicated insignificant toxicity of solvents used.

Of the 42 extracts exhibiting high activity in this study, a total of 24 samples demonstrated excellent results (100% mortality during the seven day exposure period) (Table 1). In a separate study, the crude extracts used in this experiment were screened and five samples with repellent properties identified during preliminary assays [29]. Although none of the potential repellents had maintained a repellent effect over a prolonged period, one of five samples, Litogyne gariepina had also been identified as a potential larvicide in the current study, suggesting a dual effect in different environments.

Results indicated that organic extracts exhibit a greater effect than aqueous extracts, a trend also noted in the previous repellency study [29]. In another similar insecticidal experiment, two of the highly active families screened during this experiment, Rutaceae and Zingiberaceae, were reported to yield promising botanical larvicides [33]. It was also observed in this study that almost half of the prioritized extracts induced mortality within 48 hours, suggesting a very high toxic effect at the crude stage.

Based on the mortality obtained from a large number of crude extracts, the biological activity of each plant was assessed. The most promising candidates represented by four taxa and four extracts were subjected to bioassay-guided fractionation. A total of 36 semi pure fractions were tested in a manner similar to that of the crude extracts (Table 2). A loss of activity was observed in two of the four extracts, relative to the preliminary screening of crude samples. Aloe greatheadii var. davyana (Asphodelaceae) showed 100% mortality for only one fraction, whilst four of the five fractions of Toddalia asiatica (Rutaceae) induced 100% mortality within 96 hours of exposure, making it the favoured extract for further investigation of active compounds. The Rutaceace have earlier been shown to induce insecticidal effects against mosquitoes [34,35]. Murraya koenigii possesses mosquitocidal properties through effects of hormone regulation with subsequent disruption of instar development of Anopheles stephensi, Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti[34]. Tiwari et al.[35] found that the essential oil obtained from seeds of Zanthoxylum armatum (Rutaceae) displayed promising larvicidal activity when tested against An. stephensi, Cx quinquefasciatus and Ae. aegypti larvae.

Toddalia asiatica has gained popularity amongst traditional health practitioners for treating numerous ailments. Amongst the documented ethnomedicinal uses, the fruit of this plant is known to have been popularly applied in treating malaria, particularly in East Africa [36]. The current study has revealed that the leaves of T. asiatica contain compounds toxic against the larvae of An. arabiensis. The current findings compare well with a study conducted in India, which has revealed that T. asiatica fruits contains anti-larval compounds active against the 3rd instar stages of the two mosquito vectors, Ae. aegypti and Cx quinquefasciatus[37].


Conclusions

Although organophosphates, such as temephos, have shown to be very effective in this study, they are not favoured due to their high toxicity to humans, low stability and high cost implications [38]. Bioactive constituents of plants hold potential to be employed as larvicides useful in controlling mosquito vectors [39]. The present study has successfully identified a plant with superior larvicidal activity for both the crude and semi pure fractions thus indicating a potential for use in the control of the malaria vector, An. arabiensis. Results obtained during this study have initiated ongoing investigations into the isolation of purified active components of T. asiatica, with a view to developing an environmentally acceptable tool of value in integrated vector control.


Competing interests

There have been no competing interests.


Authors' contributions

RM was involved in designing of the study and supervising trials. RG conducted the experiments and was involved in the interpretation of the results. NRC was involved in rationally selecting suitable plant candidates for investigation. Extracts were prepared by VM and PP. NB and PF coordinated and provided scientific inputs into the entire study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Supplementary Material Additional file 1

Table S1. Mosquito larvicidal screening results of extracts from South African ethnomedicinal plants.


Click here for additional data file (1475-2875-11-320-S1.xls)


Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology of South Africa for the Innovation Fund Grant (Project 31313 and TM1002FP). Furthermore, we wish to thank Mr Ashokoomar Saikoolal for his technical assistance in conducting the larvicidal screening.


References
Mouatcho JC,Hargreaves K,Koekemoer LL,Brooke BD,Oliver SV,Hunt RH,Coetzee M,Indoor collections of the Anopheles funestus group (Diptera: Culicidae) in sprayed houses in northern KwaZulu-NatalSouth Afr Malar JYear: 2007630
World Health OrganizationWorld malaria report WHO Global Malaria ProgrammeYear: 2011
National Department of HealthNational Malaria Programme Performance Review Directorate: Malaria and other Vector-Borne DiseasesYear: 2009
National Department of HealthNational Department of Health Strategic PlanYear: 201011-201213
Lubombo Spatial Development InitiativeThe LSDI Annual ReportYear: 2009 http://www.malaria.org.za/lsdi/Reports/2009/LSDIMaputoAnnualReport2009.pdf.
Brooke BD,Kloke G,Hunt RH,Koekemoer LL,Temu EA,Taylor ME,Small G,Hemingway J,Coetzee M,Bioassay and biochemical analyses of insecticide resistance in southern African Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae)Bull Entomol ResYear: 20019126527210.1079/BER200110811587622
Hargreaves K,Hunt RH,Brooke BD,Mthembu J,Weeto MM,Awolola TS,Coetzee M,Anopheles arabiensis and An. quadriannulatus resistance to DDT in South AfricaMed Vet EntomolYear: 20031741742210.1111/j.1365-2915.2003.00460.x14651656
Mouatcho JC,Munhenga G,Hargreaves K,Brooke BD,Coetzee M,Koekemoer LL,Pyrethroid resistance in a major African malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis from Mamfene, northern KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaS Afr J SciYear: 2009105127131
Walker K,Cost-comparison of DDT and alternative insecticides for malaria controlMed Vet EntomolYear: 20001434535410.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00262.x11129697
Le Sueur D,Sharp BL,Temperature dependent variation in the head capsule width and wing length of Anopheles merus and implications for anopheline taxonomyMed Vet EntomolYear: 19915556210.1111/j.1365-2915.1991.tb00521.x1768901
Maharaj R,Life table characteristics of Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) under simulated seasonal conditionsJ Med EntomolYear: 20034073774210.1603/0022-2585-40.6.73714765646
Bruce-Chwatt LJ,Essential malariologyYear: 1985London: William Heinemann Medical Books
Rajkumar S,Jebanesan A,Mosquitocidal activity of octacosane from Moschosma polystachyum L. (Lamiaceae)J EthnopharmacolYear: 200490878910.1016/j.jep.2003.09.03014698514
Markouk M,Bekkouche K,Larhsini M,Bousaid M,Lazrek HB,Jana M,Evaluation of some Moroccan medicinal plant extracts for larvicidal activityJ EthnopharmacolYear: 20007329329710.1016/S0378-8741(00)00257-911025168
Chariandy CM,Seaforth CE,Phelps RH,Pollard GV,Khambay BP,Screening of medicinal plants from Trinidad and Tobago for antimicrobial and insecticidal propertiesJ EthnopharmacolYear: 19996426527010.1016/S0378-8741(98)00130-510363843
Tona L,Ngimbi NP,Tsakala M,Mesia K,Cimanga K,Apers S,De Bruyne T,Pieters L,Totté J,Vlietinck AJ,Antimalarial activity of 20 crude extracts from nine African medicinal plants used in Kinshasa, CongoJ EthnopharmacolYear: 19996819320310.1016/S0378-8741(99)00090-210624878
Sathiyamoorthy P,Lugasi-Evgi H,Van Damme P,Abu-Rabia A,Gopas J,Pollack Y,Golan-Goldhirsh A,Larvicidal activity in desert plants of the Negev and Bedouin market plant productsInt J PharmacogYear: 19973526527310.1076/phbi.35.4.265.13314
Thangam TS,Kathiresan K,Mosquito larvicidal activity of mangrove plant extracts and synergistic activity of R. apiculata with pyrethrum against Culex quinquefasciatusInt J PharmacogYear: 199735697110.1076/phbi.35.1.69.13263
Geerts S,Van Blerk K,Triest L,Effect of Ambrosia maritima on Anopheles stephensi and Aedes aegyptiJ EthnopharmacolYear: 19944271110.1016/0378-8741(94)90016-78046947
Evans DA,Raj RK,Extracts of Indian plants as mosquito larvicidesIndian J Med ResYear: 19888838413182034
Dharmshaktu NS,Prabhakaran PK,Menon PK,Laboratory study on the mosquito larvicidal properties of leaf and seed extract of the plant Agave americanaJ Trop Med HygYear: 19879079822882030
Bagavan A,Rahuman AA,Evaluation of larvicidal activity of medicinal plant extracts against three mosquito vectorsAsian Pac J Trop MedYear: 20114293410.1016/S1995-7645(11)60027-821771411
Singh KV,Bansal SK,Larvicidal properties of perennial herb Solanum xanthocarpum against vectors of malaria and dengue/DHFCurr SciYear: 200384749751
Evans DA,Raj RK,Larvicidal efficacy of quassin against Culex quinquefasciatusIndian J Med ResYear: 1991933243271778621
Govindarajan M,Larvicidal and repellent activities of Sida acuta Burm. F. (Family: Malvaceae) against three important vector mosquitoesAsian Pac J Trop MedYear: 2010369169510.1016/S1995-7645(10)60167-8
Francois G,van Looveren M,Timperman G,Chimanuka B,AkeAssi L,Holenz J,Bringmann G,Larvicidal activity of the naphthylisoquinoline alkaloid dioncophylline-A against the malaria vector Anopheles stephensiJ EthnopharmacolYear: 19965412513010.1016/S0378-8741(96)01459-68953426
Zarroug IMA,Nuggud AD,Bashir AK,Mageed AA,Evaluation of Sudanese plantsInt J Crude Drug ResYear: 1988267780
Clarkson C,Maharaj VJ,Crouch NR,Grace OM,Pillay P,Matsabisa MG,Bhgawandin N,Smith PJ,Folb PI,In vitro antiplasmodial activity of medicinal plants native to or naturalised in South AfricaJ EthnopharmacolYear: 20049217719110.1016/j.jep.2004.02.01115137999
Maharaj R,Maharaj V,Newmarch M,Crouch NR,Bhagwandin N,Folb PI,Pillay P,Gayaram R,Evaluation of selected South African ethnomedicinal plants as mosquito repellents against the Anopheles arabiensis mosquito in a rodent modelMalar JYear: 2010930110.1186/1475-2875-9-30121029442
Maharaj R,Maharaj V,Crouch NR,Bhagwandin N,Folb PI,Pillay P,Gayaram R,Screening for adulticidal bioactivity of South African plants against Anopheles arabiensis Malar JYear: 20111023310.1186/1475-2875-10-23321835000
World Health OrganizationManual on practical entomologyYear: 1975Geneva: WHO
World Health OrganizationGuidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicidesYear: 2005WHO13 CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/.
Jang Y,Kim M,Ahn Y,Lee H,Larvicidal activity of Brazilian plants against Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens pallens (Diptera: Culicidae)Agric Chem BiotechnolYear: 200245131134
Arivoli S,Tennyson S,Studies on the mosquitocidal activity of Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng (Rutaceae) leaf extracts against Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae)Asian J Exp Biol SciYear: 20112721730
Tiwary M,Naik SN,Tewary DK,Mittal PK,Yadav S,Chemical composition and larvicidal activities of the essential oil of Zanthoxylum armatum DC (Rutaceae) against three mosquito vectorsJ Vector Borne DisYear: 20074419820417896622
Orwa JA,Jondiko IJ,Minja RJ,Bekunda M,The use of Toddalia asiatica (L) Lam. (Rutaceae) in traditional medicine practice in East AfricaJ EthnopharmacolYear: 200811525726210.1016/j.jep.2007.09.02417996412
Borah R,Kalita MC,Kar A,Talukdar A,Larvicidal efficacy of Toddalia asiatica (Linn.) Lam against two mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatusAfr J BiotechnolYear: 2010925272530
Maharaj R,Global trends in insecticide resistance and impact on disease vector control measuresOAIPYear: 201132733
Das NG,Goswami D,Rabha B,Preliminary evaluation of mosquito larvicidal efficacy of plant extractsJ Vect Borne DisYear: 200744145148

Tables
[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Crude extracts exhibiting 100% mortality during preliminary laboratory trials


Family Plant species Voucher number Plant part Extraction Mortality time (hours)
Araliaceae
Cussonia spicata Thunb.
EN00867
Fruit
DCM
72
Asphodeleace
Aloe greatheadii Schönland var. davyana (Schönland) Glen & D.S.Hardy
EN00021
Leaves and twigs
DCM
120
Asteraceae
Litogyne gariepina (DC.) Anderb.
EN00213
Roots
DCM
96
 
Pentzia globosa Less.
EN00506
Leaves
Water
48
 
Psiadia punctulata (DC.) Oliv. & Hiern ex Vatke
BP00278
Leaves
DCM
144
 
Vernonia natalensis Oliv. & Hiern
EN00331
Whole plant
Water
48
Capparaceae
Capparis tomentosa Lam.
EN00222
Stems
Water
24
 
Capparis tomentosa Lam.
EN00222
Leaves
Water
48
Ebenaceae
Euclea natalensis A.DC.
EN00760
Roots
DCM
48
 
Euclea natalensis A.DC.
EN00760
Stems
DCM
96
Euphorbiaceae
*Ricinus communis L.
EN00768
Fruit
DCM
48
Fabaceae
Philenoptera violacea (Klotzsch) Schrire
MM00019
Stems
DCM
24
 
Pterocarpus angolensis DC.
EN00083
Roots
Water
48
 
Pterocarpus angolensis DC.
EN00083
Roots
MeOH
144
Lamiaceae
*Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit.
BP00243
Leaves, stems and fruits
Water
48
Olacaceae
Ximenia caffra Sond. var. caffra
EN00110
Roots
Water
48
Phyllanthaceae
Flueggea virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Voigt
BP00207
Leaves and twigs
Water
24
Plumbaginaceae
Plumbago zeylanica L. (1)
EN00208
Leaves
DCM
48
 
Plumbago zeylanica L. (2)
EN00208
Leaves
DCM
48
Rutaceae
Macrostylis squarrosa Bartl. & H.L.Wendl.
EN00758
Stems
DCM
24
 
Toddalia asiatica (L.) Lam. (1)
EN00211
Leaves
DCM
72
 
Toddalia asiatica (L.) Lam. (2)
EN00211
Leaves
DCM
72
Thymelaeaceae
Gnidia cuneata Meisn.
EN00716
Stems
DCM
144
Zingiberaceae Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweinf.) B.L.Burtt EN00148 Rhizomes Ether 72

*exotic to South Africa.


[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

The larvicidal activity of thirty six fractions of the most promising plant extracts


Plant species Family Plant part Extraction Fraction Number % Mortality
Rutaceae
Macrostylis squarrosa
Stems
DCM
1-7
22
 
 
 
 
11-14
70
 
 
 
 
19-21
68
 
 
 
 
22
25
 
 
 
 
23
5
 
 
 
 
24
18
 
 
 
 
26-29
57
 
 
 
 
44-63/17-20
77
Rutaceae
Toddalia asiatica
leaves
DCM
2-3
10
 
 
 
 
100-122
100
 
 
 
 
17-27/36-60
100
 
 
 
 
36-47/8-12
100
 
 
 
 
168-180/11-19
100
Asphodeleace
Aloe greatheadii var. davyana
Leaves + Twigs
DCM
1-11
18
 
 
 
 
12-18
43
 
 
 
 
19-27
23
 
 
 
 
28-32
32
 
 
 
 
33-41
100
 
 
 
 
42-52
20
 
 
 
 
53-54
17
 
 
 
 
55-67
58
 
 
 
 
68-75
42
 
 
 
 
76-77
63
 
 
 
 
78-82
25
 
 
 
 
83-85
12
Asteraceae
Vernonia natalensis
All parts
Water
31-35
27
 
 
 
 
36-38
10
 
 
 
 
29-30
22
 
 
 
 
1-28
20
 
 
 
 
39-41
32
 
 
 
 
42-44
40
 
 
 
 
45-50
28
 
 
 
 
51-54
12
 
 
 
 
55-65
50
 
 
 
 
66-69
57
        70-76 45


Article Categories:
  • Research


Previous Document:  Determination of the caffeine contents of various food items within the Austrian market and validati...
Next Document:  Membrane dynamics and interactions in measles virus dendritic cell infections.