Document Detail


Screening for nutrition interventions: the risk or the differential-benefit approach?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  8615348     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The risk approach has been promoted to improve screening for nutrition interventions on the premise that indicators of risk also predict greater response to interventions. This study tested whether the determinants of the risk of poor growth (eg, low length-for-age) at 36 mo of age were the same as the determinants of differential benefit from food supplementation. The sample included 460 Guatemalan children who were exposed to either a high-energy, high-protein drink (atole) or a low-energy, no-protein drink (fresco) during their first 36 mo of life [INCAP (Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama) supplementation trial]. Low maternal stature, poor socioeconomic status, inadequate home diet, high diarrhea rates, and low anthropometry scores at 3 or 6 mo were all determinants of the risk of poor growth. Only indicators of child's thinness at 3 or 6 mo of age (low weight-for-age, weight-for-length, or midupper arm circumference) were determinants of differential benefit from supplementation. Thus, the development of screening indicators should be based on analyses of the predictors of differential benefit, not on conventional risk-factor analysis.
Authors:
M T Ruel; J P Habicht; K M Rasmussen; R Martorell
Related Documents :
8891078 - Alcohol consumption and regular benzodiazepine use in 55-year-old female malmö residen...
16989958 - The drinking-induced disinhibition scale (dids): a measure of three types of disinhibit...
19476678 - Sweets and sugar-sweetened soft drink intake in childhood in relation to adult bmi and ...
1484528 - Premorbid smoking, alcohol consumption, and coffee drinking habits in parkinson's disea...
9063368 - Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the peruvian andes: risk factors identified from a village c...
12025038 - Hair restoration surgery through micrografting techniques.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of clinical nutrition     Volume:  63     ISSN:  0002-9165     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Clin. Nutr.     Publication Date:  1996 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1996-06-06     Completed Date:  1996-06-06     Revised Date:  2009-11-19    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376027     Medline TA:  Am J Clin Nutr     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  671-7     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutrition of Central American, Guatemala.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Anthropometry
Body Weight / physiology
Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena*
Child, Preschool
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diarrhea / epidemiology,  physiopathology,  prevention & control
Diet / standards*
Dietary Proteins / administration & dosage*
Female
Food, Fortified / economics
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Intervention Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Mass Screening / economics*
Maternal Welfare
Risk Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
HD22440/HD/NICHD NIH HHS
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Dietary Proteins

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Position paper on trans fatty acids. ASCN/AIN Task Force on Trans Fatty Acids. American Society for ...
Next Document:  Analysis of body-composition techniques and models for detecting change in soft tissue with strength...