| Screening for fetal growth disorders by clinical exam in the era of obesity. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 23079776 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Objective:To evaluate the performance of clinical estimation of fetal weight as a screening test for fetal growth disorders and then to estimate the effect of maternal body mass index (BMI) on its screening efficiency.Study Design:This was a retrospective cohort study of patients referred for third trimester ultrasound for the indication of 'size unequal to dates'. Patients with medical co-morbidities that may alter their a priori risk for fetal growth disorders were excluded. The incidence of fetal growth disorders as well as amniotic fluid disturbances was determined for each group and then compared across maternal BMI categories of <25 kg m(-2), 25-30 kg m(-2), 30 kg m(-2) and 40 kg m(-2). To evaluate the accuracy of clinical estimation of fetal weight in predicting fetal growth disorders, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratios, as well as number needed to scan (NNS) was calculated and compared across BMI categories.Result:Of 51 366 patients, 1623 were referred for the indication of size>dates and 1543 for the indication of size<dates. The incidence of fetal growth disorders in each referral group was low and was not significantly different across BMI categories. The sensitivity and specificity were 9.7 and 96.6% for predicting neonatal birth weight (BW)>90th percentile and 13.5 and 96.7% for predicting BW<10th percentile. The NNS to detect one neonate with a BW<10th percentile ranged from 5 to 19, whereas the NNS to detect one neonate with a BW>90th percentile ranged from 6 to 13 across BMI categories.Conclusion:Overall, clinical estimation of fetal weight yields a low detection rate of fetal growth abnormalities; however, its screening efficiency is not adversely impacted by maternal BMI.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 18 October 2012; doi:10.1038/jp.2012.130. |
| | |
Authors:
|
K R Goetzinger; M G Tuuli; A O Odibo; K A Roehl; G A Macones; A G Cahill |
Related Documents
:
|
23678966 - Conceptual basis for prescriptive growth standards from conception to early childhood: ... 2132426 - Some extrathyroid regulatory mechanisms' aspects in thyroid humoral state at the delivery. 16405406 - Intrauterine diagnosis and management of fetal goitrous hypothyroidism: a report of an ... 11268926 - Psychomotor and audiological assessment of infants born to mothers with subclinical thy... 315526 - Pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein levels in normal and toxemic pregnancy. 16037116 - The implantation of every embryo facilitates the chances of the remaining embryos to im... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2012-10-18 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association Volume: - ISSN: 1476-5543 ISO Abbreviation: J Perinatol Publication Date: 2012 Oct |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2012-10-19 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8501884 Medline TA: J Perinatol Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: - |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Prenatal counseling beyond the threshold of viability.
Next Document: A reversible nanoswitch as an ON-OFF photocatalyst.