Document Detail


Screening for distress and depression in cancer patients: is ultrashort depression screening a valid measure in the UK? A prospective validation study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19345059     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This study sought to validate the two-question (2Q) depression screen as a screening tool for psychological distress and depression against four criterion measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], General Health Questionnaire-12, Brief Symptom Inventory-18 [BSI-18], and the distress thermometer) for a UK cancer population. We used a prospective cross-sectional study design. A consecutive sample of 399 outpatients from four outpatient oncology clinics and a palliative care day center in North London were initially identified. Of these, 249 were eligible, of whom 171 consented to take part. Data were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic analysis to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the 2Q depression instrument against the cutoff scores already shown to demonstrate clinically significant symptoms ("caseness") in the criterion measures. Sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated in addition to positive and negative predictive values. The 2Q depression screen showed sensitivity of 68%-89% and specificity of 70%-84% when compared with our four criterion measures in screening for psychological distress; its best performance was against the HADS (89% sensitivity and 79% specificity). In screening for depression, the 2Q depression screen showed sensitivity of 84%-94% and specificity of 72%-73% when compared with our two criterion measures, its best performance being against the BSI depression subscale (94% sensitivity and 72% specificity). Our study demonstrated that the 2Q depression screen showed good psychometric properties, which further supports its usefulness as a simple instrument in screening for psychological distress in cancer patients in the UK.
Authors:
Joseph Low; Sue Gessler; Rachael Williams; Emma Daniells; Veronica Brough; Adrian Tookman; Louise Jones
Related Documents :
24612629 - Coping as a predictor of treatment outcome in people at clinical high risk of psychosis.
24506079 - Randomized placebo-controlled d-cycloserine with cognitive behavior therapy for pediatr...
23539639 - Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms form a traumatic and non-traumatic stress respo...
24596569 - Gene-environment interactions and intermediate phenotypes: early trauma and depression.
23939299 - Association of depression with adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronar...
24913339 - Individual variation in temporal relationships between stress and functional somatic sy...
12366649 - Storytelling of co-operative team meetings in acute psychiatric care.
8201739 - The effectiveness of the nicotine patch for smoking cessation. a meta-analysis.
18037099 - Efficacy of intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta administered every 2 w...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Validation Studies     Date:  2009-04-02
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of pain and symptom management     Volume:  38     ISSN:  1873-6513     ISO Abbreviation:  J Pain Symptom Manage     Publication Date:  2009 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-08-03     Completed Date:  2009-10-13     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8605836     Medline TA:  J Pain Symptom Manage     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  234-43     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health Sciences, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit, Royal Free & University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom. j.low@medsch.ucl.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Affective Symptoms / diagnosis*,  psychology
Aged
Depression / diagnosis*,  psychology
Female
Great Britain
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms / complications*,  psychology*
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Reference Standards

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Providing culturally sensitive palliative care in the desert-the experience, the need, the challenge...
Next Document:  The effect of a multimodal intervention on treatment-related symptoms in patients undergoing hematop...