Document Detail


Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20678461     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
AIM: We review (1) scientific evidence questioning the validity of declaring death and procuring organs in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard of death) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard of death) donation; (2) consequences of collaborative programs realigning hospital policies to maximize access of procurement coordinators to critically and terminally ill patients as potential donors on arrival in emergency departments; and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of current practices of organ procurement on patients and their families.
DATA SOURCES: Relevant publications in peer-reviewed journals and government websites.
RESULTS: Scientific evidence undermines the biological criteria of death that underpin the definition of death in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard) donation. Philosophical reinterpretation of the neurological and circulatory-respiratory standards in the death statute, to avoid the appearance of organ procurement as an active life-ending intervention, lacks public and medical consensus. Collaborative programs bundle procurement coordinators together with hospital staff for a team-huddle and implement a quality improvement tool for a Rapid Assessment of Hospital Procurement Barriers in Donation. Procurement coordinators have access to critically ill patients during the course of medical treatment with no donation consent and with family or surrogates unaware of their roles. How these programs affect the medical care of these patients has not been studied.
CONCLUSIONS: Policies enforcing end-of-life organ procurement can have unintended consequences: (1) erosion of care in the patient's best interests, (2) lack of transparency, and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of flawed standards of declaring death.
Authors:
Mohamed Y Rady; Joseph L Verheijde; Joan L McGregor
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review     Date:  2010-06-17
Journal Detail:
Title:  Resuscitation     Volume:  81     ISSN:  1873-1570     ISO Abbreviation:  Resuscitation     Publication Date:  2010 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-08-24     Completed Date:  2010-12-21     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0332173     Medline TA:  Resuscitation     Country:  Ireland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1069-78     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA. Rady.Mohamed@mayo.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Brain Death
Critical Illness*
Death
Emergency Medicine / ethics*,  methods*
Ethics, Professional
Humans
Informed Consent
Quality of Health Care
Science*
Terminology as Topic
Tissue and Organ Procurement / ethics*,  legislation & jurisprudence*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Resuscitation. 2010 Sep;81(9):1061-2   [PMID:  20650558 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Biophysical and chemical effects of fibrin on mesenchymal stromal cell gene expression.
Next Document:  Effects of Ethidium (homidium bromide) on female reproductive performance of laboratory-reared tsets...