Document Detail


Safety of extension of a previous endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12526939     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: Data in the literature regarding complication risks after the extension of a previous endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (repeat endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy) are limited and controversial. To explore this issue, we prospectively studied complications after repeat sphincterotomy and compared them with those of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy in consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis. METHODS: A total of 250 patients underwent endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy and 81 underwent extension of a previous one. All patients had choledocholithiasis and were enrolled using specific criteria, excluding parameters predisposing to increased postsphincterotomy complications. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 2.46% in the repeat sphincterotomy and 8.4% in the sphincterotomy group (p > 0.05). Complications for the repeat sphincterotomy and initial sphincterotomy groups, respectively, were as follows: bleeding, 2.46% and 2.8%; pancreatitis, 0% and 4.8% (p < 0.05); cholangitis, 0% and 0.4%; perforation, 0% and 0.4%; and hyperamylasemia, 3.7% and 12.8% (p < 0.05). There were no deaths. Bleeding episodes in the former group occurred when repeat sphincterotomy was performed early after the primary one. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat sphincterotomy is a safe technique for the treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis and seems to be as safe as initial sphincterotomy. It is not associated with increased hemorrhage risk. There is a trend toward a higher risk of hemorrhage when repeat sphincterotomy is performed early. Repeat sphincterotomy is safer than the initial sphincterotomy with respect to pancreatic complications.
Authors:
Christos Mavrogiannis; Christos Liatsos; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Dimitris I Psilopoulos; Spyros S Goulas; Andreas Romanos; Gerasimos Karvountzis
Related Documents :
19333659 - Modified devine exclusion with vertical stomach reconstruction for gastric outlet obstr...
17197959 - Early endoscopic intervention versus early conservative management in patients with acu...
17549629 - Protective effects of baicalin and octreotide on multiple organ injury in severe acute ...
23568149 - External stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunostomy: a meta-analysis of randomize...
24632319 - Post-implantation syndrome after endovascular aortic repair using the anaconda(tm) endo...
25087939 - Impact on quality of life of using an onlay mesh to prevent incisional hernia in midlin...
21069309 - Efficacy of tolterodine for medical treatment of intramural ureteral stone with vesical...
20690869 - Effect of stretch positions on hamstring muscle length, lumbar flexion range of motion,...
22697499 - Long-term outcome after catheter ablation for left posterior fascicular ventricular tac...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of gastroenterology     Volume:  98     ISSN:  0002-9270     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Gastroenterol.     Publication Date:  2003 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-01-15     Completed Date:  2003-03-25     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0421030     Medline TA:  Am J Gastroenterol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  72-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterology, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Gallstones / surgery*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reoperation
Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic / adverse effects*,  methods*,  standards
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Aug;98(8):1894-5; author reply 1895-6   [PMID:  12907354 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Micturition is associated with phase III of the interdigestive migrating motor complex in man.
Next Document:  Surveillance cultures to monitor quality of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing.