Document Detail

The safety and effectiveness of a curved needle for vertebral augmentation: comparison with traditional techniques.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20801677     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a curved needle compared with traditional (noncurved needle) techniques in a large single-center experience.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 243 consecutive vertebral augmentation procedures over a 17-month period. Curved needle procedures were compared with noncurved needle procedures for baseline clinical variables, complication rate, pain relief, and improvement in disability. Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were compared between the two cohorts.
RESULTS: Between curved needle and noncurved needle procedures, there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline clinical variables, fracture location, and fracture etiology. No complications were noted in either group. In both groups, there was a median improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS) score of 2.0 points (P = .62). More than 90% of procedures in both groups resulted in some pain improvement (P = .78). For both groups, the median improvement in disability on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was 4.0 points (P = .69). Approximately 70% of procedures in both groups resulted in improvement in disability (P = 1.00). In single-level cases, there were shorter procedure times (51.8 min ± 2.7 vs 62.8 min ± 2.2, P = .002) and shorter fluoroscopy times (P = .31) for curved needle procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: The curved needle is as safe and effective as traditional vertebral augmentation techniques in treating the pain and disability related to vertebral compression fractures. Additionally, the curved needle is associated with shorter procedure duration and reduced fluoroscopy time.
Akriti Saxena; Reza Hakimelahi; Ruchira M Jha; Ariel E Hirsch; Marion Growney; Albert J Yoo
Related Documents :
14589197 - Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, bracing, and the hueter-volkmann principle.
15274237 - Distractible vertebral body replacement in patients with malignant vertebral destructio...
19214597 - Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion u...
17061127 - Anterior debridement and bone grafting of spinal tuberculosis with one-stage instrument...
19207277 - Testosterone replacement therapy following radical prostatectomy.
22691647 - Comparison of hemostatic matrix and standard hemostasis in patients undergoing primary ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR     Volume:  21     ISSN:  1535-7732     ISO Abbreviation:  J Vasc Interv Radiol     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-09-27     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9203369     Medline TA:  J Vasc Interv Radiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1548-53     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2010 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Gray 241, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Distal embolism of percutaneous arterial closure device resulting in critical limb ischemia.
Next Document:  Antegrade access to the superficial femoral artery with ultrasound guidance: feasibility and safety.