Document Detail


Routines in facility-based maternity care: evidence from the Arab World.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16101607     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To document facility-based practices for normal labour and delivery in Egypt, Lebanon, the West Bank (part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory) and Syria and to categorise common findings according to evidence-based obstetrics.
DESIGN: Three studies (Lebanon, West Bank and Syria) interviewed a key informant (providers) in maternity facilities. The study in Egypt directly observed individual labouring women.
SETTING: Maternity wards.
SAMPLE: Nationally representative sample of hospitals drawn in Lebanon and Syria. In the West Bank, a convenience sample of hospitals was used. In Egypt, the largest teaching hospital's maternity ward was observed.
METHODS: Shared practices were categorised by adapting the World Health Organization's (WHO) 2004 classification of practices for normal birth into the following: practices known to be beneficial, practices likely to be beneficial, practices unlikely to be beneficial and practices likely to be ineffective or harmful.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Routine hospital practices for normal labor and delivery.
RESULTS: There was infrequent use of beneficial practices that should be encouraged and an unexpectedly high level of harmful practices that should be eliminated. Some beneficial practices were applied inappropriately and practices of unproven benefit were also documented. Some documented childbirth practices are potentially harmful to mothers and their babies.
CONCLUSION: Facility practices for normal labour were largely not in accordance with the WHO evidence-based classification of practices for normal birth. The findings are worrying given the increasing proportion of facility-based births in the region and the improved but relatively high maternal and neonatal mortality ratios in these countries. Obstacles to following evidence-based protocols for normal labour require examination.
Authors:
Related Documents :
25274357 - Corrigendum.
18771167 - Leadership and learning from the politicians.
9406107 - Certainty, probability and abduction: why we should look to c.s. peirce rather than gö...
11495317 - The assessment of sport-related concussion: the evidence behind neuropsychological test...
22592387 - A novel quantitative approach to concept analysis: the internomological network.
12489047 - Fibrin sheaths and central venous catheter occlusions: diagnosis and management.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology     Volume:  112     ISSN:  1470-0328     ISO Abbreviation:  BJOG     Publication Date:  2005 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-08-16     Completed Date:  2005-09-29     Revised Date:  2013-06-09    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100935741     Medline TA:  BJOG     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1270-6     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Delivery, Obstetric / methods*
Female
Health Status
Hospitals, Maternity
Humans
Labor, Obstetric*
Maternal Health Services / organization & administration*
Middle East
Pregnancy
Professional Practice / organization & administration*
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
074986//Wellcome Trust
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Emergency obstetric care in developing countries: impact of guidelines implementation in a community...
Next Document:  Misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour in the home delivery setting in rural Gam...