Document Detail

Routine protein energy supplementation in adults: systematic review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9712593     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether routine oral and enteral nutritional supplementation can improve the weight, anthropometry, and survival of adult patients.
DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of oral or enteral protein supplementation in adults. Trials were identified from Medline (Silver Platter 3.11, 1966-96), reference lists of identified studies and review articles, and communication with feed manufacturers.
SUBJECTS: Randomised controlled trials comparing oral or enteral protein supplementation with no routine supplementation. All trials of adult subjects were included except those addressing nutrition in pregnancy.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in body weight and anthropometry (mid-arm muscle circumference), and all cause case fatality recorded at the end of scheduled follow up. Body weight and anthropometry were analysed as the weighted mean difference and 95% confidence intervals of the percentage change in these variables. Case fatality was analysed with odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: 32 eligible reports (2286 randomised patients) published between February 1979 and July 1996 were identified, of which 30 (93.8%) (2062 randomised patients) reported outcomes of interest. Case fatality data were available for 1670 (81%) patients, and continuous variable data for up to 1607 (78%) patients. The treatment group receiving routine nutritional supplementation showed consistently improved changes in body weight and anthropometry compared with controls; weighted mean difference 2.06% (95% confidence interval 1.63% to 2.49%) and 3.16% (2.43% to 3.89%) respectively. The pooled odds ratio for death in the treatment group was 0.66 (0.48 to 0.91, 2P<0.01). Apparent benefits were observed in several prespecified subgroups of patients, treatment settings, and interventions, but were not evident if trials with less robust methodology were excluded.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine oral or enteral supplementation seems to improve the nutritional indices of adult patients, but there are insufficient data in trials which meet strict methodological criteria to be certain if mortality is reduced. Benefits were not restricted to particular patient groups. Further large pragmatic randomised controlled trials of routine nutritional supplementation are justified.
J Potter; P Langhorne; M Roberts
Related Documents :
9623033 - Metabolic and immune effects of dietary arginine, glutamine and omega-3 fatty acids sup...
2512533 - Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy for long-term feeding in patients w...
24357673 - Urinary biomarkers of aki and mortality 3 years after cardiac surgery.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Meta-Analysis    
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMJ (Clinical research ed.)     Volume:  317     ISSN:  0959-8138     ISO Abbreviation:  BMJ     Publication Date:  1998 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-09-25     Completed Date:  1998-09-25     Revised Date:  2013-04-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8900488     Medline TA:  BMJ     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  495-501     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Victoria Geriatric Unit, Victoria Infirmary NHS Trust, Glasgow G41 3DX.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Administration, Oral
Ambulatory Care
Body Weight
Dietary Proteins / administration & dosage*
Dietary Supplements
Follow-Up Studies
Middle Aged
Nutrition Disorders / therapy*
Parenteral Nutrition / methods*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Sensitivity and Specificity
Survival Analysis
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Dietary Proteins
Comment In:
BMJ. 1999 Mar 20;318(7186):808   [PMID:  10082719 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Characterization of an ammonium transport protein from the peribacteroid membrane of soybean nodules...
Next Document:  Effectiveness of the postcoital test: randomised controlled trial.