Document Detail

Risk of stroke with coronary artery bypass graft surgery compared with percutaneous coronary intervention.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22917004     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is associated with an increased risk of stroke compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Some, but not all, randomized trials have reported increased rates of stroke with CABG compared with PCI. However, all these studies were powered insufficiently to examine differences in the risk of stroke reliably.
METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 19 trials in which 10,944 patients were randomized to CABG versus PCI. The primary end point was the 30-day rate of stroke. We also determined the rate of stroke at the midterm follow-up and investigated whether there was an interaction between revascularization type and the extent of coronary artery disease on the relative risk of stroke.
RESULTS: The 30-day rate of stroke was 1.20% after CABG compared with 0.34% after PCI (odds ratio: 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.69 to 5.09, p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed after a median follow-up of 12.1 months (1.83% vs. 0.99%, odds ratio: 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 2.56, p = 0.02). The extent of coronary artery disease (single vessel vs. multivessel vs. left main) did not affect the relative increase in the risk of stroke observed with CABG compared with PCI at either 30 days (p = 0.57 for interaction) or midterm follow-up (p = 0.08 for interaction). Similar results were observed when the outcomes in 33,980 patients from 27 observational studies were analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary revascularization by CABG compared with PCI is associated with an increased risk of stroke at 30 days and at the mid-term follow-up.
Tullio Palmerini; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Letizia Bacchi Reggiani; Diego Sangiorgi; Laura Alessi; Stefano De Servi; Angelo Branzi; Gregg W Stone
Related Documents :
16157524 - Clinical evaluation of a new concept: resting myocardial perfusion heterogeneity quanti...
9885804 - 99tcm-sestamibi tomoscintigraphy at rest and after nitrate administration in predicting...
16911184 - Independent risk factors for progression of coronary atherosclerosis in hemodialysis pa...
11174964 - Identification of perfusion abnormalities using fso69, a novel contrast agent, in consc...
20536454 - Thymosin beta4 and cardiac repair.
3814054 - Does digoxin sensitize left ventricular mechanoreceptors?
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American College of Cardiology     Volume:  60     ISSN:  1558-3597     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  2012 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-08-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8301365     Medline TA:  J Am Coll Cardiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  798-805     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Istituto di Cardiologia, Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Silent brain injury after cardiac surgery: a review: cognitive dysfunction and magnetic resonance im...
Next Document:  Family history of premature death and risk of early onset cardiovascular disease.