Document Detail

Risk ranking: investigating expert and public differences in evaluating food safety hazards.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21067676     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
The allocation of resources with respect to food safety issues requires that decision makers prioritize these issues, which may conflict with the public's opinions on these matters. The purpose of this study was to compare how Canadian expert and lay respondents rank different food hazards, with a view to better understanding their underlying rationales for making decisions on food safety. A Carnegie Mellon risk ranking model was adapted for use by individuals with different backgrounds to rank six food safety issues: bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, botulism, paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP), and acrylamide. Focus groups were conducted using public (n=29) and expert (n=21) participants. Key themes were identified from the focus groups as reasons why issues were rated high or low. The most common themes for high rankings were prevalence (of an agent) and/or severity (of a disease) and knowledge and control of a food safety issue. For the lowest rankings, common themes included low prevalence and severity and personal control over an issue. Explanations for why choices were made included availability, affect, numeracy, and optimistic bias. The majority of the rationales used by all participants were similar with the exception of the high ranking given to acrylamide by the public participants. The effect of attribute framing seemed to be the most influential in a participant's choices. Understanding that comparable reasoning is used in food safety decisions by both experts and the public has important implications for developing productive risk communication dialogues about issues and priorities.
Kevin Webster; Cindy Jardine; Sean B Cash; Lynn M McMullen
Related Documents :
11786646 - Safety considerations of dna in food.
24908606 - Evaluation of aeration pretreatment to prepare an inoculum for the two-stage hydrogen a...
18274976 - Good nutritional practice from producer to consumer.
18450326 - How trust in institutions and organizations builds general consumer confidence in the s...
25280406 - Design and validation of a program to identify inadequate intake of iron, zinc, and vit...
17986316 - Carbohydrate consumption and esophageal cancer:an ecological assessment.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of food protection     Volume:  73     ISSN:  0362-028X     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Food Prot.     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-11-11     Completed Date:  2010-11-23     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7703944     Medline TA:  J Food Prot     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1875-85     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Consumer Participation
Consumer Product Safety*
Decision Making
Focus Groups
Foodborne Diseases / psychology*
Middle Aged
Public Opinion
Risk Assessment*
Young Adult

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 surrogate organisms to evaluate beef carcass intervention...
Next Document:  Thermoaciduric Clostridium pasteurianum spoilage of shelf-stable apple juice.