Document Detail

Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15809773     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
The objective of this study was to identify the rate of anal sphincter lacerations in a large population-based database and analyze risk factors associated with this condition. Data were obtained from Pennsylvania Healthcare Cost Containment Council (PHC4) regarding all cases of obstetrical third and fourth degree perineal lacerations that occurred during a 2-year period from January 1990 to December 1991. Modifiable risk factors associated with this condition were analyzed, specifically episiotomy, forceps-assisted vaginal delivery, forceps with episiotomy, vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, and vacuum with episiotomy. There were a total of 168,337 deliveries in 1990 and 165,051 deliveries in 1991 in Pennsylvania. Twenty-two percent (n = 74,881) of the deliveries were by cesarean section and were excluded from analysis. Among the remaining 258,507 deliveries, there were 18,888 (7.3%) third and fourth degree lacerations. Instrumental vaginal delivery, particularly with use of episiotomy, increased the risk of laceration significantly [forceps odds ratio (OR): 3.84, forceps with episiotomy OR: 3.89, vacuum OR: 2.58, vacuum with episiotomy OR: 2.93]. Episiotomy on the whole was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of sphincter tears. However, episiotomy in the absence of instrumental delivery seems to be protective with an OR of 0.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.93]. Instrumental vaginal delivery, particularly forceps delivery, appears to be an important risk factor for anal sphincter tears. The risk previously attributed to episiotomy is probably due to its association with instrumental vaginal delivery. Forceps delivery is associated with higher occurrence of anal sphincter injury compared to vacuum delivery.
Vani Dandolu; Ashwin Chatwani; Ozgur Harmanli; Clara Floro; John P Gaughan; Enrique Hernandez
Related Documents :
10549773 - Distal mucocolpos and proximal hematocolpos secondary to concurrent imperforate hymen a...
16846603 - Postpartum evaluation of stress urinary incontinence among primiparas.
2611173 - Do raised serum luteinizing hormone levels during stimulation for in-vitro fertilizatio...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article     Date:  2005-04-05
Journal Detail:
Title:  International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction     Volume:  16     ISSN:  -     ISO Abbreviation:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct     Publication Date:    2005 Jul-Aug
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-10-07     Completed Date:  2005-11-10     Revised Date:  2011-08-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9514583     Medline TA:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  304-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Temple University Hospital, Seventh floor, Out Patient Building, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Anal Canal / injuries*
Databases as Topic
Delivery, Obstetric / adverse effects*,  instrumentation,  statistics & numerical data
Episiotomy / adverse effects,  statistics & numerical data
Lacerations / etiology*
Obstetrical Forceps / adverse effects,  statistics & numerical data
Perineum / injuries
Population Surveillance
Risk Factors
Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical / adverse effects,  statistics & numerical data

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Anatomical outcome and quality of life following posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair using collag...
Next Document:  Vesicouterine fistula as a complication of forceps delivery: a case report.