| Revisiting the novelty effect: when familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20804299 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Reports of superior memory for novel relative to familiar material have figured prominently in recent theories of memory. However, such novelty effects are incongruous with long-standing observations that familiar items are remembered better. In 2 experiments, we explored whether this discrepancy was explained by differences in the type of familiarity under consideration or by differences in the difficulty of discriminating targets from lures, which may lead to source confusion for familiar but not novel targets. In Experiment 1, we directly tested whether previously observed novelty effects were the result of novelty, discrimination demands, or both. We used linguistic materials (proverbs) to replicate the novelty effect but found that it occurred only when familiar items were subject to source confusion. In Experiment 2, to examine better how novelty influences episodic memory, we used experimentally familiar, pre-experimentally familiar, and novel proverbs in a paradigm designed to overcome discrimination demand confounds. Memory was better for both types of familiar proverbs. These results indicate that familiarity, not novelty, leads to better episodic memory for studied items, regardless of whether familiarity is experimentally induced or based on prior semantic knowledge. We argue that proposals that state that information is encoded better if it is novel are based on over-generalizations of effects arising from the distinctiveness of novel materials. |
| | |
Authors:
|
J Poppenk; S Köhler; M Moscovitch |
Related Documents
:
|
19706549 - Medial temporal lobe activity can distinguish between old and new stimuli independently... 17352619 - Recognition memory for novel stimuli: the structural regularity hypothesis. 1262789 - Are more items identified than can be reported? 21443329 - When goals collide: the interaction between prospective memory and task switching. 1956309 - Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading. 21312099 - Priming effects with ambiguous figures. 6839139 - Word matching and lexical decisions: a visual half-field study. 19494159 - The central nucleus of the amygdala and corticotropin-releasing factor: insights into c... 22218499 - Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition Volume: 36 ISSN: 1939-1285 ISO Abbreviation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Publication Date: 2010 Sep |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-08-31 Completed Date: 2010-12-13 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8207540 Medline TA: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 1321-30 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
(c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved). |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. j.poppenk@utoronto.ca or |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Female Humans Male Mental Recall / physiology* Photic Stimulation Recognition (Psychology) / physiology* Young Adult |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Imagined positive emotions and inhibitory control: the differentiated effect of pride versus happine...
Next Document: False memories seconds later: the rapid and compelling onset of illusory recognition.