Document Detail

Responses of primary health care professionals to UK national guidelines on the management and referral of women with breast conditions.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12164978     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the responses of primary health care professionals to guidelines in general, and to the UK national guidelines on the management and referral of women with breast conditions in particular.
METHODS: Qualitative study using practice-based, semistructured group discussions with primary health care professionals. All practices were involved in a study evaluating the effect of the national breast symptom management guidelines on clinical practice. Discussion groups were conducted in the practice; fifteen of the 34 study practices were audio-taped. Groups comprised the available partners and practice nurses at each practice. All members of each group were well known to one another. There was good attendance by all doctors, with 75% of male partners and 90% of female partners present at the meetings. Of the practice nurses 51% attended. In all, 86 professionals attended the meetings.
RESULTS: A number of areas for comment arose consistently in each discussion. Guidelines in general were welcomed, although there was more support for evidence-based than consensus-based guidelines. The breast lump guideline was also welcomed, participants commenting that it was concordant with current practice. The breast pain guideline was more contentious, participants reflecting that it recommended more primary care management than was usual, and fell outside the experience and confidence of doctors or the expectations of patients. Participants felt it did not incorporate psychosocial factors into recommended management, despite this being an important part of primary care management.
CONCLUSIONS: There are concerns about consensus guidelines and doubts about the applicability of the breast pain guideline in this complex management area. The failure of these guidelines to address patient anxiety may limit their implementation.
Related Documents :
18775588 - Withdrawn: national guidelines. guidelines on parenteral nutrition from the german soci...
16299628 - Proteinuria--cari guidelines.
17973708 - New guidelines for maternal and neonatal resuscitation.
9695898 - Breaking bad news. 3: encouraging the adoption of best practices.
19151878 - Biomedical and health informatics in translational medicine.
3985018 - Career management: an active process.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of evaluation in clinical practice     Volume:  8     ISSN:  1356-1294     ISO Abbreviation:  J Eval Clin Pract     Publication Date:  2002 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-08-07     Completed Date:  2002-11-08     Revised Date:  2014-02-24    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9609066     Medline TA:  J Eval Clin Pract     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  319-25     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Attitude of Health Personnel*
Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis,  therapy*
Great Britain
Pain / diagnosis
Pain Management
Practice Guidelines as Topic*
Primary Health Care / standards*
Referral and Consultation*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The views of primary health care professionals about the management of breast problems in clinical p...
Next Document:  The effect of a hepatitis serology testing algorithm on laboratory utilization.