| Research, ethics committees and legal issues. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 15597476 Owner: KIE Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Who should be publicly authorised to consider legal issues in research? This paper argues that public policy should authorise ethics committees to consider legal issues about their own actions regarding particular research proposals; and that it should not authorise them to consider legal issues regarding the actions of their applicants, or the actions of third parties. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Andrew Moore |
Related Documents
:
|
16086486 - Life after death: preservation of the immortal seed. 10967176 - Law and ethics in conflict over confidentiality? 2712966 - Ethics and bioethics. 10735656 - Ethics gap in surgery. 18828936 - Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment. 16127616 - The japanese pharmacological society 72nd annual meeting. 22-25 march 1999, sapporo, ho... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: New Zealand bioethics journal Volume: 4 ISSN: 1175-3455 ISO Abbreviation: N Z Bioeth J Publication Date: 2003 Oct |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2004-12-14 Completed Date: 2004-12-29 Revised Date: 2007-11-15 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 101142623 Medline TA: N Z Bioeth J Country: New Zealand |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 8-15 Citation Subset: E |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Philosophy, University of Otago, New Zealand. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Ethical Review
/
legislation & jurisprudence Ethics Committees, Research / legislation & jurisprudence*, organization & administration* Humans Jurisprudence Multicenter Studies as Topic New Zealand Public Policy* |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Ethics of re-membering and remembering: considering disability and biotechnology.
Next Document: Minimally invasive removal or revision of lumbar spinal fixation.