Document Detail

Reproducibility of esophageal high-resolution manometry.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21496179     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Background  Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method for esophageal function testing that has prompted the development of new parameters for quantitative analysis of esophageal function. Until now, the reproducibility of these parameters has not been investigated. Methods  Twenty healthy volunteers underwent HRM on two separate days. Standard HRM parameters were measured. In addition, in conventional (virtual) line tracings, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, relaxation pressure, and relative relaxation pressure were measured. Firstly, for each variable, the mean percentage of covariation (100 × SD/mean: %COV) was derived as a measure of inter- and intra-individual variation. Secondly, Kendall's coefficients of concordance (W values) were calculated. Thirdly, Bland-Altman plots were used to express concordance graphically. Key Results  Statistically significant concordance values were found for upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (W = 0.90, P = 0.02), transition zone length (W = 0.92, P = 0.01), LES length (W = 0.81, P = 0.04), LES pressure (W = 0.75, P = 0.05), LES relaxation pressure (W = 0.75, P = 0.03), relative LES relaxation pressure (W = 0.78, P = 0.05), gastric pressure (W = 0.81, P = 0.04), and contraction amplitude 5 cm above the LES (W = 0.86, P = 0.03). In conventional setting, only LES resting pressure (W = 0.835, P = 0.03) proved significant. In HRM tracings, concordance values for contraction wave parameters, and in conventional line tracings, LES relaxation pressure and relative relaxation pressure did not reach levels of statistical significance. Conclusions & Inferences  Esophageal HRM yields reproducible results. Parameters that represent anatomic structures show better reproducibility than contraction wave parameters. The reproducibility of LES resting and relaxation pressure assessed with HRM is better than with conventional manometry and further supports the clinical use of HRM.
A Bogte; A J Bredenoord; J Oors; P D Siersema; A J P M Smout
Related Documents :
21152369 - Photoacoustic generation of focused quasi-unipolar pressure pulses.
5359919 - Blood pressure in a scottish island community.
21403289 - Microscopic dynamics of structural transition in iron with a nanovoid under shock loading.
19707489 - Automated pressure-controlled discography with constant injection speed and real-time p...
21307489 - Entrance window design parameters for high-pressure gas x-ray imaging detectors.
8662479 - High-pressure framework silicates
6173529 - Efficacy and adverse effects of captopril in severe refractory hypertension.
9293969 - Are the inotropic and antiarrhythmic effects of bradykinin due to increases in coronary...
1828309 - Comparison of propofol and thiopentone as induction agents for laparoscopy.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-4-18
Journal Detail:
Title:  Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1365-2982     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-4-18     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9432572     Medline TA:  Neurogastroenterol Motil     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Gastrointestinal Research Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on body composition in offspring.
Next Document:  Reasons patients give to use or not to use immunomodulating agents for multiple sclerosis.