Document Detail


Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16303951     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To establish the reproducibility of a rebound tonometer in humans and the effect of corneal thickness on measurements, comparing it with Goldmann applanation tonometer. METHODS: In a first study designed to examine the reliability of the RBT, three experienced ophthalmologists undertook three consecutive intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements in 12 eyes of 12 normal subjects. A cross-sectional study was then performed to compare measurements obtained using the two tonometers in 147 eyes of 85 patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. RESULTS: Intraobserver coefficients of correlation obtained in the reproducibility study were 0.82, 0.73, and 0.87. Interobserver correlation was 0.82. There was a good correlation between IOP readings obtained by the RBT and the GAT (r = 0.865, P < 0.0001). RBT readings were consistently higher than GAT measurements (median difference, 1.8 +/- 2.8 mm Hg). A Bland-Altman plot indicated the 95% limits of agreement between the two methods were -3.7 to 7.3 mm Hg (slope = -0.022, P = 0.618). Using RBT, the point that best discriminated between patients with an IOP < or = 21 mm Hg and those with >21 mm Hg, as determined by the GAT was >23 mm Hg (sensitivity, 70.5%; specificity, 95.1%). In terms of pachymetry, the two tonometers behaved in a similar way, with correlation observed between IOP measurements and central corneal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Rebound tonometry is a reproducible method of determining IOP in humans. In general, it tends to overestimate IOP compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry. The tonometers used in both methods are similarly affected by pachymetry.
Authors:
Jose M Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Alfredo Castillo; Julian Garcia-Sanchez
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Investigative ophthalmology & visual science     Volume:  46     ISSN:  0146-0404     ISO Abbreviation:  Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.     Publication Date:  2005 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-11-23     Completed Date:  2006-01-11     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7703701     Medline TA:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  4578-80     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Instituto de Investigaciones Oftalmologicas Ramon Castroviejo, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. martinezcasa@ya.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Anthropometry
Cornea / ultrasonography
Cross-Sectional Studies
Glaucoma, Open-Angle / physiopathology*
Humans
Intraocular Pressure / physiology*
Middle Aged
Ocular Hypertension / physiopathology
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tonometry, Ocular / methods*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Effect of bimatoprost on intraocular pressure in prostaglandin FP receptor knockout mice.
Next Document:  Anterior optic nerve capillary blood flow response to diurnal variation of mean ocular perfusion pre...