Document Detail


Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18411039     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To assess how information about adverse events is included in systematic reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We included all new Cochrane reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSRs) and all new reviews (2003--2004) in the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DAREs) in Issue 1 2005 of The Cochrane Library. RESULTS: More than half of Cochrane (44/78) and DARE (46/79) reviews assessed drug interventions. The rest assessed surgery (Cochrane [12]; DARE [10]), psychosocial, educational, or physiotherapy interventions (22; 23). Seventy-six percent (59/78) of Cochrane reviews mentioned adverse events as an outcome compared with 48% (38/79) of DARE reviews. Most reviews mentioning adverse events were of drug interventions (Cochrane [41/59]; DARE reviews [29/38]). Considering reviews that mentioned adverse events, 95% (56/59) of Cochrane reviews included only randomized trials and 73% (43/59) included an analysis of adverse events. For 10 Cochrane reviews, adverse events had not been reported by the included trials. In contrast, 58% (22/38) of DARE reviews mentioning adverse events included only randomized trials, the rest included both randomized and nonrandomized studies. CONCLUSIONS: Most Cochrane reviews of drug interventions considered adverse events. This was not the case for DARE reviews and for Cochrane reviews of nondrug interventions. This could be improved.
Authors:
Sally Hopewell; Luke Wolfenden; Mike Clarke
Related Documents :
19681059 - Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly 'el...
17880659 - Violence and aggression: a literature review.
19591529 - Serenoa repens (saw palmetto): a systematic review of adverse events.
22439899 - Outcomes from ovarian hyperstimulation following the sole administration of gonadotroph...
20846149 - Using cochrane reviews for oral diseases.
12714879 - Intrathoracic extravasation of antineoplastic agents: case report and systematic review.
9513659 - Nasal polyps and their relation to polyps/hypertrophic polypoid mucosa in the paranasal...
15940019 - Hirschsprung's disease in adults: report of a case and review of the literature.
18489489 - Tooth replantation after keeping the avulsed tooth in oral environment: case report of ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2008-04-14
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical epidemiology     Volume:  61     ISSN:  0895-4356     ISO Abbreviation:  J Clin Epidemiol     Publication Date:  2008 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-05-12     Completed Date:  2008-08-25     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8801383     Medline TA:  J Clin Epidemiol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  597-602     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK. shopewell@cochrane.co.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Databases, Bibliographic
Evidence-Based Medicine / standards*
Humans
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) / methods,  standards
Pharmaceutical Preparations / adverse effects*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research Design
Review Literature as Topic*
Terminology as Topic
Therapeutics / adverse effects*
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Pharmaceutical Preparations

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Individual allocation had an advantage over cluster randomization in statistical efficiency in some ...
Next Document:  Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive resul...