Document Detail


Relative durations of conditioned stimulus and intertrial interval in conditioned suppression.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  3746188     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The effects of the relative durations of the conditional stimulus and the intertrial interval on bar pressing during a conditioned-suppression procedure were examined as a function of two additional variables--type of operant baseline schedule and rate of shock presentation. In Experiment 1, response suppression was compared across components of a multiple fixed-ratio, random-ratio, fixed-interval, random-interval schedule, at relative conditioned-stimulus/intertrial-interval durations of 1/1, 1/4, and 1/9. In Experiment 2, relative conditioned-stimulus/intertrial-interval duration (1/5, 3/3, or 5/1) was manipulated across groups, while shock frequency (2, 6, or 10 shocks/hr) was manipulated within groups. In both experiments, suppression during the signal was virtually complete at all relative durations. Responding was also suppressed during the intertrial interval, but that suppression varied as a function of experimental manipulations. In Experiment 1, intertrial-interval response rates were higher when relative signal duration was 1/9 than when it was 1/1, although both relative signal duration and shock frequency, which covaried, could have contributed to the difference. In Experiment 2, the patterning of response rates between successive shocks was affected by relative duration, absolute rates during the intertrial interval varied as a function of shock frequency, and differences between suppression during the signal and suppression during the intertrial interval were affected by both relative duration and shock frequency. The data support an analysis based upon relationships between shock-correlated and intertrial-interval stimuli and, as assessed by the relative-delay-to-reinforcement metric, are comparable to results that have been reported from experiments using similar manipulations under the autoshaping paradigm.
Authors:
D A Coleman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Related Documents :
16812088 - Contrast and induction in multiple schedules of discrete-trial concurrent reinforcement.
13863578 - Intermittent reinforcement by removal of a conditioned aversive stimulus.
19070338 - Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of re...
16812428 - Preference for unsegmented interreinforcement intervals in concurrent chains.
17253958 - Actin cytoskeleton in arabidopsis thaliana under blue and red light.
12351278 - "motion-resistant" pulse oximetry: a comparison of new and old models.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior     Volume:  46     ISSN:  0022-5002     ISO Abbreviation:  J Exp Anal Behav     Publication Date:  1986 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1986-09-26     Completed Date:  1986-09-26     Revised Date:  2010-09-10    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0203727     Medline TA:  J Exp Anal Behav     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  51-66     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animals
Association Learning
Conditioning (Psychology)*
Conditioning, Classical
Conditioning, Operant
Cues
Electroshock
Male
Rats
Rats, Inbred Strains
Reinforcement Schedule
Time Factors
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
RR07064/RR/NCRR NIH HHS
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Observational learning of two visual discriminations by pigeons: a within-subjects design.
Next Document:  Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.