|Relationship between Angiographic Late Loss and 5-Year Clinical Outcome after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 23225797 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review|
|Purpose: Currently, insufficient data exist to evaluate the relationship between angiographic late loss (LL) and long-term clinical outcome after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. In this study, we hypothesized that angiographic LL between 0.3 and 0.6 mm correlate with favorable long-term clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Patients were enrolled in the present study if they had undergone both DES implantation in single coronary vessel and a subsequent follow-up angiogram (n=634). These individuals were then subdivided into three groups based on their relative angiographic LL: group I (angiographic LL <0.3 mm, n=378), group II (angiographic LL between 0.3 and 0.6 mm, n=124), and group III (angiographic LL >0.6 mm, n=134). During a 5-year follow-up period, all subjects were tracked for critical events, defined as any cause of death or myocardial infarction, which were then compared among the three groups. Results: Mean follow-up duration was 63.0±10.0 months. Critical events occurred in 25 subjects in group I (6.6%), 5 in group II (4.0%), and 17 in group III (12.7%), (p=0.020; group I vs. group II, p=0.293; group II vs. group III, p=0.013). In a subsequent multivariate logistic regression analysis, chronic renal failure [odds ratio (OR)=3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48-7.31, p=0.003] and long lesion length, defined as lesion length >28 mm (OR=1.88, 95% CI: 1.02-3.46, p=0.042) were independent predictors of long-term critical events. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis fails to demonstrate that post-DES implantation angiographic LL between 0.3 and 0.6 mm is protective against future critical events.|
|Young-June Yang; Sanghoon Shin; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Jung-Sun Kim; Dong-Ho Shin; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Yangsoo Jang; Myeong-Ki Hong|
Related Documents :
|811237 - Effect of bromhexine on the incidence of postoperative bronchopneumonia after upper abd...
24165817 - Target-controlled infusion vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol with alfentanil...
3232497 - Alizapride in the prevention of postoperative vomiting. a double-blind comparison.
24150997 - Long-term efficacy and safety of fluphenazine in patients with tourette syndrome.
23277297 - Effect of a reduction of the atlanto-axial angle on the cranio-cervical and subaxial an...
22670637 - Laparoendoscopic single-site versus traditional laparoscopic surgery in patients with c...
|Type: Journal Article|
|Title: Yonsei medical journal Volume: 54 ISSN: 1976-2437 ISO Abbreviation: Yonsei Med. J. Publication Date: 2013 Jan|
|Created Date: 2012-12-11 Completed Date: - Revised Date: -|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 0414003 Medline TA: Yonsei Med J Country: Korea (South)|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 41-7 Citation Subset: IM|
|Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, and Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea. firstname.lastname@example.org.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Yonsei Med J
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Yonsei Med. J
Journal ID (publisher-id): YMJ
Publisher: Yonsei University College of Medicine
© Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2013
Received Day: 10 Month: 1 Year: 2012
Revision Received Day: 24 Month: 2 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 27 Month: 2 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Day: 01 Month: 1 Year: 2013
Electronic publication date: Day: 28 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Volume: 54 Issue: 1
First Page: 41 Last Page: 47
PubMed Id: 23225797
|Relationship between Angiographic Late Loss and 5-Year Clinical Outcome after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation|
1Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
2Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Corresponding author: Dr. Myeong-Ki Hong, Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, and Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea. Tel: 82-2-2228-8458, Fax: 82-2-393-2041, email@example.com
[equal] *Young-June Yang and Sanghoon Shin contributed equally to this work.
Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been widely used in percutaneous coronary interventions and they have reduced both restenosis rates and the need for repeat revascularizations when compared with bare-metal stents.1,2 However, the safety and superiority of DESs has recently been called into question by data from several long-term monitory studies, in particular the incidence of stent thrombosis.3,4 Specifically, late stent thrombosis is believed to result from delayed coronary artery healing secondary to excessive inhibition of neointimal formation, with emerging data suggesting that the ratio of uncovered stent struts to total stent struts is the best morphometric predictor of late stent thrombosis.5 Furthermore, the development of optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows for more accurate evaluation of the neointimal coverage of stent struts-widely regarded as the most powerful predictor of stent thrombosis based on several histopathologic studies.6,7 However, given the cost and limited availability of this imaging modality, performing a follow-up OCT after every DES placement is currently not feasible in daily clinical practice. The angiographic late loss (LL)-defined as the difference between the post-intervention minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and follow-up MLD-is considered one of the most important endpoints used to evaluate DES efficacy,8 with our previous OCT study showing that angiographic LLs between 0.3 and 0.6 mm may represent an optimal midpoint between restenosis and stent thrombosis.6 No clear clinical evidence to support these aforementioned angiographic cut-off values from previous study currently exists; therefore, the present study was designed to evaluate whether post-DES-placement angiographic LL between 0.3 mm and 0.6 mm correlate with a lower incidence of critical events.
In total, 1062 patients were treated with DES for single coronary vessel de novo lesions between March 2003 and December 2004, with only two types of DES used: sirolimus-eluting (Cypher™, Cordis, Miami, FL, USA) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus™, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). Inclusion criteria for the present study included: an elective or emergent percutaneous coronary intervention, all those aged between 18 and 80 years, and follow-up of coronary angiogram 6-12 months after stent placement. Exclusion criteria included cardiogenic shock, age younger than 18 or greater than 80 years, lack of an angiographic follow-up study, and multi-vessel or multi-lesion stent placements. Angiographic follow-up studies were generally performed for the following reasons: evidence suggesting myocardial ischemia upon stress test, clinical evidence of acute coronary syndrome, or planned follow-up angiography for other study protocols. Using the percutaneous coronary intervention database at our institute, 636 patients who met both the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and subsequently divided into three groups according to angiographic LL-individuals with angiographic LL <0.3 mm (group I; n=378), individuals with angiographic LL between 0.3 and 0.6 mm (group II; n=124), and individuals with angiographic LLs >0.6 mm (group III; n=134). In all cases, DES implantation was performed using conventional techniques without complication, with performing operator's discretion determining the DES type employed. All patients were treated with 200 mg of aspirin and a loading dose (300 to 600 mg) of clopidogrel prior to coronary intervention. Unfractionated heparin was also administered in an initial bolus of 100 IU/kg at this time, with additional boluses given throughout the procedure to achieve an activated clotting time of 250 to 300 seconds. Dual anti-platelet therapy (aspirin 100 mg/day and clopidogrel 75 mg/day) was given to all patients for at least 9 months after stent placement.
All clinical events were defined per those established by the Academic Research Consortium.9 All deaths were considered cardiac deaths unless a definite non-cardiac cause could be established. Myocardial infarctions were defined as clinical symptoms, electrocardiographic changes or abnormal imaging findings suggestive of myocardial infarction in combination with an increase in the serum creatine kinase MB or troponin-T/troponin-I to a level greater than the 99th percentile of the upper normal limit not related to an interventional procedure. Definite, probable, and possible stent thrombosis was defined per the recommendations of the Academic Research Consortium.9 Target vessel revascularization was defined as either the percutaneous or surgical revascularization of the stented epicardial vessel. For the present study, the primary outcome was the incidence of critical events-defined as any cause of death or myocardial infarction during the 5-year follow-up period-which was then compared between the three subgroups.
Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was performed using an offline quantitative coronary angiography system (CASS System II, Pie Medical Imaging, Nuenen, the Netherlands) both before and after stent placement and at the time of follow-up angiogram. Both the MLD of the DES-treated coronary lesions and the reference diameter were measured in the most severe view that was not foreshortened.
All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System software (SAS; v9.1.3., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), with all data expressed as frequencies as mean±SD. Categorical data were compared by either chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test. Continuous data were presented as mean±standard deviation, and compared using the Student's t-test. Comparisons between all three groups were performed via an analysis of variance using the Bonferroni correction for post hoc analysis. In cases where the distributions were skewed, a non-parametric test was used. We estimated the cumulative event rate using the Kaplan-Meier method. To identify independent predictors for critical events, a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify possible significant associations between the events and a number of independent variables, then the variables with a univariate analysis p-value of <0.1 and significant clinical variables (acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus) were entered into the final multivariate logistic regression analysis. In all cases, a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics among the three groups are shown in Table 1. Paclitaxel-eluting stents were used more frequently in group III. Post-intervention MLD was also significantly greater in group III. All comparisons of long-term clinical events between the three groups are shown in Table 2. Mean follow-up duration for all subjects was 63.0±10.0 months (63.0±9.9 for group I, 64.2±9.2 for group II, and 62.8±10.7 for group III; p=0.458). Death or myocardial infarction occurred in 25 patients in group I (6.6%), 5 patients in group II (4.0%), and 17 patients in group III (12.7%), with (p=0.020; group I vs. group II, p=0.293; group II vs. group III, p=0.013). Target vessel revascularization was performed in 38 individuals in group I (10.1%), 17 individuals in group II (13.7%), and 50 individuals in group III (37.3%), with p<0.001. Stent thrombosis occurred in 14 subjects in group I (3.7%), 4 subjects in group II (3.2%), and 8 subjects in group III (6.0%), with p=0.452. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics between patients who did and did not experience long-term critical events during the 5-year follow-up period are listed in Table 3. In the subsequent multivariate logistic regression analysis, the independent predictors of long term critical events were chronic renal failure [odds ratio (OR)=3.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48-7.31; p=0.003] and long lesion length (lesion length >28 mm; OR=1.88; 95% CI: 1.02-3.46; p=0.042) (Table 4). The incidence of clinical events according to the longitudinal follow-up time using Kaplan-Meier curves can be seen in Fig. 1.
The degree of LL was closely related to in-stent restenosis by the proliferation of neointimal tissue. One previous angiographic study of 1011 lesions treated with sirolimus-eluting stents reported that in-stent LL-an angiographic surrogate for neointimal hyperplasia-is positively correlated with clinical restenosis, and therefore potentially useful for discriminating between new DESs because the binary restenosis rates are anticipated to be low.10 Another recent meta-regression analysis of 15846 patients from 29 randomized clinical trials also reported that LL is a strong predictor of binary angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization.11 Accordingly, it appears that the new DES platforms need to achieve as low LL as possible to be safe and certainly well below the 0.5 mm in order to ensure the rare need for target vessel revascularization.11 However, reducing post-DES-placement LL to decrease the need for target vessel revascularization may paradoxically increase the probability of uncovered stent struts, as smaller LL values correlate with higher percentages of uncovered stent struts. Recently, the safety profile of DESs has been called into question, primarily due to their potential association with stent thrombosis and subsequent catastrophic outcomes, with uncovered stent struts believed to represent the most significant predictor of stent thrombosis. Therefore, while stent strut neointimal coverage may exert a protective role against stent thrombosis, exaggerated neointimal proliferation, which directly results in larger LL value, increases the likelihood of target vessel revascularization. Given this paradox, the presence of minimal neoinitmal stent strut coverage (e.g., coverage that is neither absent nor profuse) may optimally balance the risk of restenosis with that of stent thrombosis. In a previous study,6 we proposed 2 angiographic LL cut-off values for predicting the percentage of uncovered struts in DES-treated lesions. Lesions with an angiographic LL <0.3 mm, in which neointimal hyperplasia was suppressed, were associated with a lower risk of restenosis, however, they were more likely to contain uncovered struts, and carry a greater risk of stent thrombosis. Conversely, lesions with an angiographic LL >0.6 mm had significantly fewer uncovered struts, a greater risk of restenosis, and were more likely to require target-lesion revascularization; however, they carried a lower risk of stent thrombosis. Based on the previous hypothesis-generation study, we proposed the safety margins of post-DES-placement angiographic LL between 0.3 mm and 0.6 mm in order to balance the risks of restenosis and stent thrombosis.6
In the present study, although the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (including stent thrombosis) was lowest in group II, statistical significance was not reached when compared with group I. We believe that several possible factors may explain these results. First, this study is retrospective and non-randomized; therefore, it is intrinsically vulnerable to selection bias and other unobserved confounding factors. Second, the incidence of major adverse clinical events during the 5-year follow-up was low to achieve statically significant differences. Third, the number of enrolled patients was relatively small. Lastly, neointimal growth may have been delayed after DES implantation, as several previous animal studies suggest that, when compared with bare-metal stents, late neointimal growth may occur despite a marked early suppression of neointimal formation within DESs.12,13 Furthermore, neoatherosclerosis may also develop earlier in DES-treated lesions when compared to bare-metal stent-treated lesions. Data now demonstrate that although atherosclerotic changes often do not appear until 2 years after bare-metal stent implantation and remain a rare finding at 4 years, atherosclerotic changes-including foamy macrophage infiltration and early necrotic core formation-were observed in more than 40% of patients 9 months after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.14 A more recent autopsy study also reported that the incidence of neointimal atherosclerotic change was significantly greater in DES-treated lesions (31%) when compared to bare-metal stent-treated lesions (16%).15 Another recent OCT study showed that rupture of lipid-laden neointima inside DES may be associated with late stent thrombosis after DES implantation.16 Accordingly, it is unlikely that LL is the only factor affecting the dynamic process of neoatherosclerosis within DES-treated lesions, and the causes of stent thrombosis and other cardiac events. The results presented here correlate well with previous studies, which demonstrated a negative relationship between LL and stent thrombosis.17,18
In conclusion, our hypothesis that an angiographic LL between 0.3 and 0.6 mm may correlate with a lower incidence of critical events after DES placement was not supported by the results of this long-term clinical follow-up study.
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
|1.||Tu JV,Bowen J,Chiu M,Ko DT,Austin PC,He Y,et al. Effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents in OntarioN Engl J MedYear: 20073571393140217914040|
|2.||Stone GW,Moses JW,Ellis SG,Schofer J,Dawkins KD,Morice MC,et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stentsN Engl J MedYear: 2007356998100817296824|
|3.||Daemen J,Wenaweser P,Tsuchida K,Abrecht L,Vaina S,Morger C,et al. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort studyLancetYear: 200736966767817321312|
|4.||Iakovou I,Schmidt T,Bonizzoni E,Ge L,Sangiorgi GM,Stankovic G,et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stentsJAMAYear: 20052932126213015870416|
|5.||Finn AV,Joner M,Nakazawa G,Kolodgie F,Newell J,John MC,et al. Pathological correlates of late drug-eluting stent thrombosis: strut coverage as a marker of endothelializationCirculationYear: 20071152435244117438147|
|6.||Kim BK,Kim JS,Ko YG,Choi D,Jang Y,Hong MK. Correlation of angiographic late loss with neointimal coverage of drug-eluting stent struts on follow-up optical coherence tomographyInt J Cardiovasc ImagingYear: 2012281289129721863320|
|7.||Kim U,Kim JS,Kim JS,Lee JM,Son JW,Kim J,et al. The initial extent of malapposition in ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with drug-eluting stent: the usefulness of optical coherence tomographyYonsei Med JYear: 20105133233820376884|
|8.||Pocock SJ,Lansky AJ,Mehran R,Popma JJ,Fahy MP,Na Y,et al. Angiographic surrogate end points in drug-eluting stent trials: a systematic evaluation based on individual patient data from 11 randomized, controlled trialsJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 200851233218174032|
|9.||Cutlip DE,Windecker S,Mehran R,Boam A,Cohen DJ,van Es GA,et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitionsCirculationYear: 20071152344235117470709|
|10.||Mauri L,Orav EJ,O'Malley AJ,Moses JW,Leon MB,Holmes DR Jr,et al. Relationship of late loss in lumen diameter to coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stentsCirculationYear: 200511132132715655127|
|11.||Brener SJ,Prasad AJ,Khan Z,Sacchi TJ. The relationship between late lumen loss and restenosis among various drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trialsAtherosclerosisYear: 201121415816221122853|
|12.||Carter AJ,Aggarwal M,Kopia GA,Tio F,Tsao PS,Kolata R,et al. Long-term effects of polymer-based, slow-release, sirolimus-eluting stents in a porcine coronary modelCardiovasc ResYear: 20046361762415306217|
|13.||Farb A,Heller PF,Shroff S,Cheng L,Kolodgie FD,Carter AJ,et al. Pathological analysis of local delivery of paclitaxel via a polymer-coated stentCirculationYear: 200110447347911468212|
|14.||Nakazawa G,Vorpahl M,Finn AV,Narula J,Virmani R. One step forward and two steps back with drug-eluting-stents: from preventing restenosis to causing late thrombosis and nouveau atherosclerosisJACC Cardiovasc ImagingYear: 2009262562819442951|
|15.||Nakazawa G,Otsuka F,Nakano M,Vorpahl M,Yazdani SK,Ladich E,et al. The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stentsJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 2011571314132221376502|
|16.||Ko YG,Kim DM,Cho JM,Choi SY,Yoon JH,Kim JS,et al. Optical coherence tomography findings of very late stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantationInt J Cardiovasc ImagingYear: 20122871572321656060|
|17.||Takano M,Yamamoto M,Murakami D,Inami S,Okamatsu K,Seimiya K,et al. Lack of association between large angiographic late loss and low risk of in-stent thrombus: angioscopic comparison between paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stentsCirc Cardiovasc IntervYear: 20081202720031651|
|18.||Rivero F,Moreno R,Barreales L,Galeote G,Sánchez-Recalde A,Calvo L,et al. Lower levels of in-stent late loss are not associated with the risk of stent thrombosis in patients receiving drug-eluting stentsEuroInterventionYear: 2008412413219112789|
Keywords: Coronary artery disease, stents, outcome assessment.
Previous Document: Adjunctive Cilostazol versus High Maintenance Dose of Clopidogrel in Patients with Hyporesponsivenes...
Next Document: Reference diameters of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in the korean population.