Document Detail

Reinstatement versus reactivation effects on active memory in infants.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10620375     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Reinstatement and reactivation are procedurally different reminder paradigms used with infants and children, but most developmental psychologists do not distinguish between them. In 4 experiments with 102 three-month-olds, we asked if they differ functionally as well. Independent groups of infants received either a reactivation or a reinstatement reminder 3 days after training, when the memory is active, but its specific details have been forgotten. In Experiment 1, we measured retention after increasing delays until infants forgot altogether. A single reinstatement protracted retention twice as long after training as a single reactivation. In Experiments 2-4, whether the reminder was the original training stimulus or a novel one differentially affected the duration and specificity of memory in the 2 procedures as well. These data demonstrate that the distinction between reinstatement and reactivation is not artificial. In addition to differing procedurally, reinstatement and reactivation differ functionally, with different memory-preserving effects.
S A Adler; A Wilk; C Rovee-Collier
Related Documents :
18177635 - Can infants be "taught" to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? the ...
1914625 - Are insecure-avoidant infants with extensive day-care experience less stressed by and m...
1693595 - Balloon atrial septostomy in infants with transposition of the great arteries (d-tga): ...
2142955 - Roles of function, reminding, and variability in categorization by 3-month-old infants.
21253175 - Preventive health examinations part ii.
6797185 - The control of the adaptation of the human neonate to postnatal nutrition.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of experimental child psychology     Volume:  75     ISSN:  0022-0965     ISO Abbreviation:  J Exp Child Psychol     Publication Date:  2000 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2000-03-01     Completed Date:  2000-03-01     Revised Date:  2007-11-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985128R     Medline TA:  J Exp Child Psychol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  93-115     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2000 Academic Press.
Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Conditioning, Classical / physiology*
Random Allocation
Reinforcement (Psychology)*
Retention (Psychology)*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time Factors
Grant Support

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Probing the vitamin D sterol-binding pocket of human vitamin D-binding protein with bromoacetate aff...
Next Document:  Pseudoname learning by German-speaking children with dyslexia: evidence for a phonological learning ...