|Regulation of ISWI involves inhibitory modules antagonized by nucleosomal epitopes.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 23143334 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|Chromatin-remodelling complexes (CRCs) mobilize nucleosomes to mediate the access of DNA-binding factors to their sites in vivo. These CRCs contain a catalytic subunit that bears an ATPase/DNA-translocase domain and flanking regions that bind nucleosomal epitopes. A central question is whether and how these flanking regions regulate ATP hydrolysis or the coupling of hydrolysis to DNA translocation, to affect nucleosome-sliding efficiency. ISWI-family CRCs contain the protein ISWI, which uses its ATPase/DNA-translocase domain to pump DNA around the histone octamer to enable sliding. ISWI is positively regulated by two 'activating' nucleosomal epitopes: the 'basic patch' on the histone H4 tail, and extranucleosomal (linker) DNA. Previous work defined the HAND-SANT-SLIDE (HSS) domain at the ISWI carboxy terminus that binds linker DNA, needed for ISWI activity. Here we define two new, conserved and separate regulatory regions on Drosophila ISWI, termed AutoN and NegC, which negatively regulate ATP hydrolysis (AutoN) or the coupling of ATP hydrolysis to productive DNA translocation (NegC). The two aforementioned nucleosomal epitopes promote remodelling indirectly by preventing the negative regulation of AutoN and NegC. Notably, mutation or removal of AutoN and NegC enables marked nucleosome sliding without the H4 basic patch or extranucleosomal DNA, or the HSS domain, conferring on ISWI the biochemical attributes normally associated with SWI/SNF-family ATPases. Thus, the ISWI ATPase catalytic core is an intrinsically active DNA translocase that conducts nucleosome sliding, onto which selective 'inhibition-of-inhibition' modules are placed, to help ensure that remodelling occurs only in the presence of proper nucleosomal epitopes. This supports a general concept for the specialization of chromatin-remodelling ATPases, in which specific regulatory modules adapt an ancient active DNA translocase to conduct particular tasks only on the appropriate chromatin landscape.|
|Cedric R Clapier; Bradley R Cairns|
Related Documents :
|24200794 - Comparative purification and characterization of two hin domains, hematopoietic interfe...
9267474 - Immunohistochemical analysis of dna synthesis during chronic stimulation with isoproter...
23847654 - Dna damage accumulation and trf2 degradation in atypical werner syndrome fibroblasts wi...
23318224 - Yy1 and a unique dna repeat element regulates the transcription of mouse cs1 (cd319, sl...
19928834 - Direct optical detection of aptamer conformational changes induced by target molecules.
367734 - Meiotic effects of dna-defective cell division cycle mutations of saccharomyces cerevis...
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2012-11-11|
|Title: Nature Volume: 492 ISSN: 1476-4687 ISO Abbreviation: Nature Publication Date: 2012 Dec|
|Created Date: 2012-12-13 Completed Date: 2012-12-21 Revised Date: 2013-07-11|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 0410462 Medline TA: Nature Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 280-4 Citation Subset: IM|
|Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA. email@example.com|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Adenosine Triphosphate / metabolism
Amino Acid Sequence
Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly
Drosophila Proteins / chemistry, genetics, metabolism
Drosophila melanogaster / enzymology, genetics*, metabolism*
Epitopes / metabolism*
Gene Expression Regulation*
Molecular Sequence Data
Nucleosomes / metabolism*
Protein Structure, Tertiary
Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid / genetics
Transcription Factors / chemistry, genetics*, metabolism*
|CA042014/CA/NCI NIH HHS; GM60415/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS; R01 GM060415/GM/NIGMS NIH HHS; //Howard Hughes Medical Institute; //Howard Hughes Medical Institute|
|0/Drosophila Proteins; 0/Epitopes; 0/ISWI protein; 0/Nucleosomes; 0/Transcription Factors; 56-65-5/Adenosine Triphosphate; EC 3.6.1.-/Adenosine Triphosphatases|
Journal ID (nlm-journal-id): 0410462
Journal ID (pubmed-jr-id): 6011
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Nature
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Nature
nihms-submitted publication date: Day: 6 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 11 Month: 11 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Day: 13 Month: 12 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 13 Month: 6 Year: 2013
Volume: 492 Issue: 7428
First Page: 280 Last Page: 284
PubMed Id: 23143334
|Regulation of ISWI involves inhibitory modules antagonized by nucleosomal epitopes|
|Cedric R. Clapier|
|Bradley R. Cairns|
|HHMI and Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
ISWI is the catalytic subunit of a set of CRCs with orthologs in all eukaryotes1 (Fig.1). To define how ISWI is intrinsically regulated, we undertook an extensive structure-function analysis of the Drosophila ISWI ATPase, and its regulation by the histone H4 tail and extranucleosomal DNA. We recognized in the amino terminus of ISWI a region similar to the ‘basic patch’10 of the histone H4 tail (Fig. 1a), and conserved in eukaryotes (Fig. 1b). To test function, we replaced either (R91A or R93A) or both arginines (2RA) with alanine. Nucleosome sliding by wild-type ISWI (ISWIwt) normally requires nucleosomes with intact H4 tails8,9 and the presence of extranucleosomal DNA11,12, however ISWIwt ATPase activity can be elicited by combining DNA and H4 tail peptide bearing the basic patch (Fig. 1c)10. Remarkably, the ISWI2RA derivative displayed ~3-fold higher ATPase activity than ISWIwt and was independent of H4 epitopes (Fig. 1c). For extended nucleosomes (200bp, 601 sequence, centrally-positioned), loss of either the basic patch (A17, A19) or the H4 tail (g4) markedly diminished (5-fold) ISWIwt activity, whereas ISWI2RA was only modestly attenuated, retaining ~63% activity and ~9-fold higher activity than ISWIwt (Fig. 1d). Notably, ISWIR91A and ISWIR93A resemble moderate and weak, respectively, gainof-function derivatives; as their ATPase activities increase, their dependence on the H4 tail decreases (Supplementary Fig. 1). Thus, ISWI2RA greatly activates ATPase activity, and renders the enzyme largely independent of the H4 tail, defining an N-terminal autoinhibitory region (AutoN) with similarity to the H4 tail (see Fig. 4b).
Remodeler ATPases are SF2-family16 DNA translocases that couple DNA translocation to ATP hydrolysis3-7,17-19_ENREF_2, wherein the two RecA-like protein lobes of the ATPase domain sequentially grip and release the DNA backbone, typically moving a small number of base pairs per ATP hydrolysis20,21_ENREF_2. ‘Coupling’ refers to how efficiently ATP hydrolysis results in productive DNA translocation. Uncoupling by mutation is well documented22,23_ENREF_24 but of unknown significance - the key question is whether and how coupling is regulated by nucleosomal epitopes. To monitor coupling, we employed a ‘tethered translocation’ system, which uses plasmid supercoiling to quantify DNA translocation by ISWI (Supplementary Fig. 2). Remarkably, DNA translocation by ISWIwt was greatly enhanced by H4 tail peptide, whereas ISWI2RA showed robust DNA translocation without peptide (Fig. 2a), consistent with our ATPase results (Fig. 1c,d).
Nucleosome sliding was monitored by achieving an equilibrium between end- and center-positioned octamers, from an initial center-positioned population (Fig. 2b). ISWI2RA yielded an end↔center equilibrium much faster than ISWIwt; ISWI2RA shifted in 30″ the amount shifted in 30′ by ISWIwt (Fig. 2b). ISWIwt required the full H4 tail for in vitro sliding (shown previously)8, and here we establish the importance of the basic patch (Fig. 2c, upper panels). Remarkably, ISWI2RA partially bypassed mutations in the H4 basic patch, enabling sliding, but only weakly bypassed the full H4 tail (Fig. 2c, lower panels). This suggested an additional H4 epitope (beyond the basic patch) needed for coupling high ATPase activity to efficient sliding, and an extensive set of experiments involving peptides and nucleosomes bearing mutations in the H4 tail revealed a major contribution from H4K12 in promoting coupling (Supplementary Fig. 3).
We next examined core nucleosomes (147 bp, 601 sequence). Supporting previous work11, ISWIwt activity required both extranucleosomal DNA and H4 tail epitopes (Fig. 1d, 2d). Interestingly, with ISWI2RA, both ATPase and sliding remained efficient on core nucleosomes (Fig. 1d, 2d), establishing independence from extranucleosomal DNA. However, omitting the H4 tail greatly reduced sliding but not ATPase activity with ISWI2RA (Fig. 1d, 2d). Taken together, AutoN functions as an autoinhibitory region, that when mutated (in ISWI2RA) largely bypasses the H4 tail for ATPase stimulation, but retains reliance on the H4 tail to ‘couple’ that ATP hydrolysis to productive DNA translocation. One simple model is that AutoN binds to and holds the ATPase domain in an inactive conformation, with the H4 tail competing for part of that surface; the binding of the H4 tail displaces AutoN and enables a conformational change that activates ISWI ATPase activity – an effect mimicked by the ISWI2RA mutation. Here, the ATPase activity of our derivative series (2RA>R91A>R93A) was the reciprocal of H4 tail stimulation (Supplementary Fig. 1), consistent with competition/antagonism for a region on ISWI involving the H4 tail and AutoN. Consistent with this model, a peptide from the AutoN region of ISWIwt (K76-E98) does not activate ISWI (Fig. 1c).
Previous work defined a HAND-SANT-SLIDE domain (HSS) present in the C-terminus of ISWI (and related Chd1) that binds extranucleosomal DNA, needed for ISWI and Chd1 remodeling activity14,15,24. However, our results with AutoN prompted a search for an analogous unknown region that prevents ATPase action unless the HSS is bound to extranucleosomal DNA. Mutiple approaches (alignments, protease mapping, structural modeling) yielded a candidate region (covering residues 617 to 648) immediately following the second of the two RecA-like ATPase lobes, which we term NegC (Fig. 3a, 3b). A structural model using Phyre2 (25; Fig. 3b), revealed NegC as a ‘C-terminal bridge’ traversing from ATPase lobe #2 back to the ATPase lobe #1, crossing the key functional ATPase cleft. Furthermore, this structural model of NegC is consistent with crosslinking experiments of ISWI26, and a recent crystal structure of Chd127. Notably NegC is conserved only in remodelers bearing an HSS domain, and regulated by extranucleosomal DNA (ISWI and Chd1, not SWI/SNF), though NegC function is entirely unknown.
To test NegC function, we isolated three ISWI C-terminal truncation derivatives: ΔC697 (omitting the HSS), ΔC648 (further deletion), and ΔC617 (omitting NegC), as well as combinations involving 2RA/AutoN mutations. First, omitting C-terminal regions from ISWIwt did not render them stimulatable by naked DNA (Fig. 3c). In contrast, both full-length ISWI2RA and ISWI2RA/ΔC derivatives were highly stimulated by DNA (Fig. 3c), showing that the ATPase domain itself has an intrinsic DNA-dependent ATPase activity which is held in check by the AutoN region (Fig. 4b). Notably, removal of the HSS domain (ΔC697 or ΔC648) prevented DNA translocation (Fig. 3d) while retaining high ATPase activity (Fig. 3c, for ISWI2RA), demonstrating a lack of coupling. Remarkably, further truncation to ΔC617 (ISWI2RA/ΔC617) restored DNA translocation (Fig. 3d) - establishing that NegC negatively regulates the coupling of ATP hydrolysis to DNA translocation (Fig. 4b).
We then tested these ISWIΔC derivatives with core or extended nucleosomes that either contain or lack the H4 tail (Fig. 3e). As expected14, omitting the HSS domain in ISWIΔC697 (or ISWIΔC648) greatly reduced sliding of extended nucleosomes (lanes 3, 4, 19, 20). Surprisingly, ISWI2RA/ΔC697 and ISWI2RA/ΔC648 displayed high ATPase activity, but completely failed to slide either core (lanes 23 and 24) or extended nucleosomes (lanes 7 and 8), mirroring the uncoupling of ATPase activity and DNA translocation above (Fig. 3c, d). Remarkably, and in keeping with our tethered translocation results, further removal of NegC (ΔC617) restored sliding activity, without an accompanying increase in ATPase activity. Restoration was moderate with ISWIΔC617 (lane 2) and efficient with ISWI2RA/ΔC617 (lane 6) on extended nucleosomes. Similarly, with core nucleosomes, sliding was low but detectable with ISWIΔC617 (lane 18), and efficient with ISWI2RA/ΔC617 (lane 22). Thus, NegC is a new region that negatively regulates sliding via ATPase/translocation uncoupling. NegC is entirely separate from, and opposite in function to, characterized regions in other ATPases that promote sliding23,28.
We then addressed how ISWI integrates the presence of nucleosomal epitopes. For ISWIwt, omission of extranucleosomal DNA (lane 17) greatly impaired sliding whereas omission of the H4 tail (lane 9, or omitting both, lane 25) prevented sliding. With ISWI2RA, loss of both the H4 tail and extranucleosomal DNA prevented sliding (lane 29), even though ATPase activity was high; comparable to ISWIwt on extended nucleosomes (lane 1). However, ISWI2RA could slide extended nucleosomes lacking the H4 tail (lane 13), or core nucleosomes bearing H4 tails (lane 21). Thus, both the H4 tail and extranucleosomal DNA contribute to coupling (Fig. 4b). Importantly, whereas ISWI2RA/ΔC697 and ISWI2RA/ΔC648 are unable to slide nucleosomes lacking the H4 tail (g4; lanes 15, 16, 31, 32), removal of NegC (ISWI2RA/ΔC617) restored relatively efficient sliding of extended g4 nucleosomes (lane 14), and moderate sliding of core g4 nucleosomes (lane 30). In keeping, removal of NegC from ISWI2RA restores sliding ability with nucleosomes bearing amino acid substitutions in both H4K12 and the basic patch (Supplementary Fig. 4). Thus, with ISWI2RA, NegC omission enables sliding of nucleosomes without a basic patch or extranucleosomal DNA (Fig. 3e, lanes 6, 14, 22, 30), properties normally defining SWI/SNF-family remodelers.
To examine AutoN and NegC impact in vivo, we expressed (in S. cerevisiae) mutations/truncations in Isw1 equivalent to those from our ISWI biochemistry (see Fig. 1b, 3a) and tested complementation (Supplementary Fig. 5), or dominant phenotypes (utilizing a sensitized rsc7Δ background, synthetically lethal with a wide range of chromatin mutants29). Interestingly, expression of an Isw1 derivative lacking both AutoN and NegC regulation prevented growth (Fig. 4a), consistent with rogue chromatin misregulation activity (note: loss of proper regulation by Isw1-associated proteins may also contribute).
Taken together, our work provides several conceptual advances that impact both ISWI regulation and mechanism (Fig. 4b). Regarding regulation, the prior model involved ‘positive’ regulation of ISWI by the H4 basic patch and by extranucleosomal DNA. Here, we replace that conception with an ‘inhibition of inhibition’ model, whereby these two nucleosomal epitopes function to relieve an intrinsic autoinhibition conferred by two new negative regulatory domains, AutoN and NegC. Notably, whereas AutoN functions primarily to inhibit ATPase activity, NegC functions to inhibit ATPase ‘coupling’ to DNA translocation, with structural models for NegC supporting this function. By this model, interaction of the HSS with extranucleosomal DNA does not activate the ATPase per se, it relieves NegC and restores ATPase coupling. Regarding mechanism, a major current model involves the HSS pushing extranucleosomal DNA into the nucleosome, providing the initial mechanical power stroke to form a translocated DNA loop on the surface of the nucleosome. However, as we observe efficient DNA translocation and nucleosome sliding following deletion of the HSS (when combined with NegC omission), the primary function of the HSS is not mechanical, but rather to regulate DNA translocation by antagonizing NegC, ensuring that coupling occurs only when extranucleosomal DNA is of sufficient length.
ISWI protein derivatives were produced as N-terminal fusions to Trigger Factor and the Tet Repressor DNA-binding domain (TF-TetR-ISWI), which heterodimerizes with an unfused TetR to enable tetO binding for DNA translocation assays. Proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)RIL, and were purified to homogeneity as monodisperse derivatives. Chemically synthetized H4 tail peptides encompass residues K8 to D24; AutoN peptide includes ISWI residues K76 to E98.
The ATPase assays were performed at 26°C using a colorimetric assay based on the formation of a complex between inorganic phosphate and molybdate-malachite green. Reactions were an addition/omission series involving ISWI (10 pmol), pBluescript plasmid (500 ng), peptide (50 μM), DNA fragments (500 fmol), or nucleosomes (500 fmol), as indicated.
Mononucleosomes utilized purified recombinant Drosophila histones expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3)RIL, assembled with 147bp or 200bp DNA fragments (isolated from a plasmid by restriction digests, and containing the 601 strong positioning sequence) by a saltdialysis linear gradient. For the 200bp fragment, the 601 sequence was centrally located.
The DNA translocation assays measured plasmid supercoils generated by a single ISWI protein anchored via its TetR fusion to a previously relaxed (by E. coli TopoisomeraseI) plasmid DNA containing a single tetO operator sequence (Supplementary Fig. 2). Deproteinized samples were loaded on a 1.3% agarose gel, subsequently stained in ethidium bromide and scanned on a Typhoon Trio (Amersham, GE).
The nucleosome sliding assays were performed at 26°C using a 1:2 enzyme:substrate molar ratio, except in the titration series. The reactions were stopped by adding competitor pBluescript plasmid DNA, and loaded on a 4.5% (37.5:1) native polyacrylamide gel, subsequently stained in ethidium bromide and scanned on a Typhoon Trio (Amersham, GE).
ISWI protein derivatives were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)RIL, upon 0.5mM IPTG induction at OD600~0.5 during 24hours at 15°C, as complexes from 2 vectors: one –pCDFDuet1- bears a TetR-(His)7 gene, the other - pCold TF (Takara) lacking the His-tag - a gene fusion containing Trigger Factor-3C cleavage site-TetR-ISWI-Flag. Between TetR and ISWI was inserted an eight amino-acid sequence GGQGGQGG. The properly assembled complex contains a heterodimer of TetR obtained by two successive affinity purifications. The bacteria cell extracts were first mixed with Ni-NTA agarose resin (Qiagen), capturing the complex and the unwanted TetR homodimer. The sample eluted from the resin was then purified using the Flag tag and anti-Flag M2 affinity gel and eluted with 3×FLAG peptide (Sigma) to obtain the desired complex. Then, Trigger Factor was cleaved from the complex using HRV 3C protease (Novagen) using 1 Unit of protease / 0.1 mg of complex by incubating 16 hours at 4°C, in presence of 10mM β-mercaptoethanol and 0.5mM EDTA. Finally, the purification of the complex was achieved by a gel filtration step on two S200GL 10/300 (Amersham, GE) in series. Obtained complexes were homogen and monodisperse.
Chemically synthetized H4 tail peptides encompass residues K8 to D24; AutoN peptide includes ISWI residues K76 to E98.
Mononucleosomes were produced from single recombinant Drosophila histones expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)RIL, purified as inclusion bodies, and assembled in octamers by salt-dialysis, essentially as described31. The 200 and 147 bp DNA fragments containing the 601 positioning sequence32 were respectively produced from plasmids pUC12×601 digested by AvaI, and pST55-16×NCP601a digested by EcoRV. For the 200bp fragment, the 601 sequence was centrally located. The DNA fragments were purified from the backbone using preparative electrophoresis (PrepCell, BioRad) 4.5% (37.5:1) native polyacrylamide gel running at 400V constant in 0.5×TBE, with TE as elution buffer. Mononucleosome assemblies were performed by titration reactions, as 50μl reaction containing 40pmol of DNA fragment in 2M KCl mixed with a variable amount of histone octamers covering the equimolar ratio, with a linear salt-gradient dialysis applied from 2M to 50mM KCl, essentially as described31, using an Econo-Pump (BioRad) and Slide-A-Lyser Mini Dialysis Units 7000MWCO (ThermoScientific).
Measurement of ATP hydrolysis was based on the formation of a complex between inorganic phosphate and molybdate-malachite green. ATPase assays were performed in 10mM Hepes pH=7.3, 20mM KOAc, 5mM MgCl2, 0.5mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA and 5% glycerol, in presence of 1mM ATP. After 30min incubation at 26°C with 500rpm shaking in a Thermomixer (Eppendorf), 800μl of MGAM reagent (3 volumes of MG=0.045%(w/v) of malachite green in 0.1N HCl, mixed with 1 volume of AM=4.2%(w/v) of ammonium molybdate in 4N HCl) were added, followed one minute later by 100μl of 34% (w/v) Na3Citrate. Measures were performed at OD=650nm 10 minutes later. In the plasmid DNA and peptides experiments, 10pmol of ISWI were used with or without 500ng of pBluescript plasmid and/or 50μM of peptide. In the mononucleosomes or DNA fragments experiments, 10pmol of ISWI were in presence of 500 fmol of nucleosomes or DNA fragments respectively.
The 20μl reaction was containing 10pmol of ISWI, with or without 15μM of peptide, in presence of 250ng of previously relaxed plasmid, 1mM ATP, 2.5U of TopoisomeraseI (NEB) in NEB1 1× buffer, 1 mg/ml BSA. Experiments were performed at 30°C for 2 hours (or shorter during time course), followed by heat inactivation at 65°C for 20 min. Deproteinization was performed by adding 2μl of Proteinase K at 10mg/ml and 1μl of SDS 20% and incubated at 50°C for 1h. Reactions were subsequently precipitated in ethanol, prior loading on a 1.3% agarose gel run for 3h at 130V. Gels were stained 20 minutes in a 1μg/ml ethidium bromide solution, and scanned on a Typhoon Trio (Amersham, GE). Time course experiments are performed using a starting reaction corresponding to a scale-up of amounts above, proportional to the number of desired aliquots.
100 fmol (or variable for titration) of ISWI were incubated in 10mM Tris pH=7.4, 50mM KCl, 3mM MgCl2, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 1mM ATP, in presence of 200 fmol of mononucleosomes for 90 min at 26°C with shaking at 500rpm in a thermomixer (Eppendorf). 10μl reactions were stopped by adding 200ng of competitor DNA (pBluescript plasmid) and incubate additional 30 min as previously. Reactions were loaded using glycerol 10% on a 4.5% (37.5:1) native polyacrylamide gel and run in 0.4× TBE for 55 minutes at 110V constant. Gel was stained 10 minutes in a 1μg/ml ethidium bromide solution, and scanned on a Typhoon Trio (Amersham, GE). Time course experiments are performed using a starting reaction corresponding to a scale-up of amounts above, proportional to the number of desired aliquots.
Plasmids expressing Isw1 derivatives were generated by marker conversion to Leu2 of pRS416-Isw1-WT33, followed by site-directed mutagenesis (via PCR) generating AAA mutations and ΔC truncations. Final constructs were verified by sequencing.
The growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain TOH1358 lacking CHD1 and ISW1 genes is temperature sensitive34. Complementation experiments were performed by transforming the strain with plasmids expressing various derivatives of Isw1 under control of the endogenous promoter, performing tenfold spot dilutions, and observing the rescue of the growth ability at high temperature. Plate medium is synthetic complete lacking leucine.
Here, we used a sensitized genetic background strain YBC 2233, lacking isw1 and rsc7. The strain was transformed with plasmids expressing separate Isw1 derivatives under control of the endogenous ISW1 promoter, selecting for colonies on synthetic complete growth medium lacking leucine. Growth ability (in spot dilution format) was tested at 30°C on SC-Leu plates lacking leucine, that either lacked or contained 5-FOA (which enforces the loss of a URA3-marked plasmid bearing RSC7).
FN1Author Contributions: BRC and CRC: experimental design. CRC: experiments and figures. BRC and CRC wrote the paper.
FN2Author Information: The authors have no competing financial interest in the work.
We thank Song Tan for pST55-16×NCP601a and Gernot Längst for pUC12×601. We thank Christoph Müller for experience gained by C. Clapier on structural aspects of ISWI protein. We thank Tom Owen-Hughes for the S. cerevisiae strain TOH1358, and Toshio Tsukiyama for the initial ISW1-containing plasmid, Phylicia Gawu for technical assistance, and Bob Schackmann for DNA sequencing and peptide synthesis. Supported by NIH GM60415 (supplies), HHMI (support of CRC and BRC), and CA042014 (core facilities).
|1.||Clapier CR,Cairns BR. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexesAnnual review of biochemistry78273304Year: 2009|
|2.||Corona DF,Tamkun JW. Multiple roles for ISWI in transcription, chromosome organization and DNA replicationBiochim Biophys Acta1677113119Year: 200415020052|
|3.||Saha A,Wittmeyer J,Cairns BR. Chromatin remodeling by RSC involves ATP-dependent DNA translocationGenes Dev1621202134Year: 200212183366|
|4.||Whitehouse I,Stockdale C,Flaus A,Szczelkun MD,Owen-Hughes T. Evidence for DNA Translocation by the ISWI Chromatin-Remodeling EnzymeMol Cell Biol2319351945Year: 200312612068|
|5.||Zofall M,Persinger J,Kassabov SR,Bartholomew B. Chromatin remodeling by ISW2 and SWI/SNF requires DNA translocation inside the nucleosomeNat Struct Mol Biol13339346Year: 200616518397|
|6.||Strohner R,et al. A ‘loop recapture’ mechanism for ACF-dependent nucleosome remodelingNat Struct Mol Biol12683690Year: 200516025127|
|7.||Saha A,Wittmeyer J,Cairns BR. Chromatin remodeling through directional DNA translocation from an internal nucleosomal siteNat Struct Mol Biol12747755Year: 200516086025|
|8.||Clapier CR,Langst G,Corona DF,Becker PB,Nightingale KP. Critical role for the histone H4 N terminus in nucleosome remodeling by ISWIMol Cell Biol21875883Year: 200111154274|
|9.||Hamiche A,Kang JG,Dennis C,Xiao H,Wu C. Histone tails modulate nucleosome mobility and regulate ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding by NURFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A981431614321Year: 200111724935|
|10.||Clapier CR,Nightingale KP,Becker PB. A critical epitope for substrate recognition by the nucleosome remodeling ATPase ISWINucleic Acids Res30649655Year: 200211809876|
|11.||Dang W,Kagalwala MN,Bartholomew B. Regulation of ISW2 by concerted action of histone H4 tail and extranucleosomal DNAMol Cell Biol2673887396Year: 200617015471|
|12.||Schwanbeck R,Xiao H,Wu C. Spatial contacts and nucleosome step movements induced by the NURF chromatin remodeling complexJ Biol Chem2793993339941Year: 200415262970|
|13.||Fazzio TG,Gelbart ME,Tsukiyama T. Two distinct mechanisms of chromatin interaction by the Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex in vivoMol Cell Biol2591659174Year: 200516227570|
|14.||Grune T,et al. Crystal structure and functional analysis of a nucleosome recognition module of the remodeling factor ISWIMol Cell12449460Year: 200314536084|
|15.||Yamada K,et al. Structure and mechanism of the chromatin remodelling factor ISW1aNature472448453Year: 201121525927|
|16.||Flaus A,Martin DM,Barton GJ,Owen-Hughes T. Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifsNucleic Acids Res3428872905Year: 200616738128|
|17.||Fitzgerald DJ,et al. Reaction cycle of the yeast Isw2 chromatin remodeling complexEMBO J2338363843Year: 200415359274|
|18.||Lorch Y,Maier-Davis B,Kornberg RD. Mechanism of chromatin remodelingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America10734583462Year: 201020142505|
|19.||Fyodorov DV,Kadonaga JT. Dynamics of ATP-dependent chromatin assembly by ACFNature418897900Year: 200212192415|
|20.||Sirinakis G,et al. The RSC chromatin remodelling ATPase translocates DNA with high force and small step sizeThe EMBO journal3023642372Year: 201121552204|
|21.||Blosser TR,Yang JG,Stone MD,Narlikar GJ,Zhuang X. Dynamics of nucleosome remodelling by individual ACF complexesNature46210221027Year: 200920033040|
|22.||Singleton MR,Dillingham MS,Wigley DB. Structure and mechanism of helicases and nucleic acid translocasesAnnu Rev Biochem762350Year: 200717506634|
|23.||Patel A,McKnight JN,Genzor P,Bowman GD. Identification of Residues in Chromodomain Helicase DNA-Binding Protein 1 (Chd1) Required for Coupling ATP Hydrolysis to Nucleosome SlidingThe Journal of biological chemistry2864398443993Year: 201122039057|
|24.||Ryan DP,Sundaramoorthy R,Martin D,Singh V,Owen-Hughes T. The DNA-binding domain of the Chd1 chromatin-remodelling enzyme contains SANT and SLIDE domainsThe EMBO journal3025962609Year: 201121623345|
|25.||Kelley LA,Sternberg MJ. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre serverNature protocols4363371Year: 2009|
|26.||Forne I,Ludwigsen J,Imhof A,Becker PB,Mueller-Planitz F. Probing the conformation of the ISWI ATPase domain with genetically encoded photoreactive crosslinkers and mass spectrometryMolecular & cellular proteomics: MCP11M111 012088Year: 2012|
|27.||Hauk G,McKnight JN,Nodelman IM,Bowman GD. The chromodomains of the Chd1 chromatin remodeler regulate DNA access to the ATPase motorMolecular cell39711723Year: 201020832723|
|28.||Sen P,Ghosh S,Pugh BF,Bartholomew B. A new, highly conserved domain in Swi2/Snf2 is required for SWI/SNF remodelingNucleic acids research3991559166Year: 201121835776|
|29.||Wilson B,Erdjument-Bromage H,Tempst P,Cairns BR. The RSC chromatin remodeling complex bears an essential fungal-specific protein module with broad functional rolesGenetics172795809Year: 200616204215|
|30.||Schrodinger LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 0.99rc6Year: 2010|
|31.||Dyer PN,et al. Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNAMethods Enzymol3752344Year: 200414870657|
|32.||Lowary PT,Widom J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioningJ Mol Biol2761942Year: 19989514715|
|33.||Tsukiyama T,Palmer J,Landel CC,Shiloach J,Wu C. Characterization of the imitation switch subfamily of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeGenes Dev13686697Year: 199910090725|
|34.||Gkikopoulos T,et al. A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organizationScience33317581760Year: 201121940898|
Previous Document: The calcium-sensing receptor regulates the NLRP3 inflammasome through Ca(2+) and cAMP.
Next Document: Nonlinear dendritic integration of sensory and motor input during an active sensing task.