| Regional differences in outcome from subarachnoid haemorrhage. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 16079959 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
BACKGROUND: Surgeons are increasingly placed under pressure to accept publication of their results and to abide by recommendations to change practice which others derive. Considerable concern exists about misinterpretation of such data. The issue is well illustrated by this study. METHOD: Data on outcome following treatment for subarachnoid haemorrhage were prospectively collected from 1993-1998 in two centres in the British Isles: Newcastle and Nottingham. FINDINGS: Initial examination of this data suggest a substantial difference in the performance favouring Nottingham over Newcastle. The odds of a poor outcome was 1:1.86 in Newcastle compared with 1:4.26 in Nottingham giving an odds ratio of 2.3 in favour of Nottingham and this difference was highly significant with p<0.00001. On a more detailed examination taking account of confounding variables, this difference disappeared entirely. Newcastle was able to operate a less selective admissions policy than Nottingham because of the deficiency of beds at the latter unit. A summary of these results has been published elsewhere. INTERPRETATION: These results illustrate the dangers of applying statistical tools developed for simpler situations such as industrial process control to complex medical problems. We conclude that comprehensive and accurate data on all factors likely to influence the outcome for a particular treatment should be collected as an absolute prerequisite to any judgments being made on apparent statistical differences between the performances of differing units. |
| | |
Authors:
|
P Mitchell; B A Gregson; T Hope; A D Mendelow |
Related Documents
:
|
19811119 - Five myths and the case against a european or national licensing examination. 6699599 - Dusting and lifting the bite print: a new technique. 16260239 - Personality type and clinical evaluations in an obstetrics/gynecology medical student c... 3620369 - Relation of alveolar size to forced vital capacity in professional divers. 16934849 - The medical zoologist--ronald vernon southcott. 3177359 - Processing of skeletal remains. a medical examiner's perspective. 9381239 - Russian medical care in the 1990s: a user's perspective. 15496589 - Identification and characterization of nuclear localization signals of camkp-n. 18807429 - Effectiveness of a premedical postbaccalaureate program in improving medical college ad... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article Date: 2005-08-09 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Acta neurochirurgica Volume: 147 ISSN: 0001-6268 ISO Abbreviation: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Publication Date: 2005 Sep |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2005-08-31 Completed Date: 2007-10-19 Revised Date: 2009-11-11 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0151000 Medline TA: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Country: Austria |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 959-64; discussion 964 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Patrick.Mitchell@ncl.ac.uk |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Adult Age Distribution Aged Aged, 80 and over Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) Data Interpretation, Statistical Emergency Medical Services / standards, utilization Female Great Britain / epidemiology Hospitals / standards, utilization Humans Male Middle Aged Neurosurgical Procedures / mortality*, standards, utilization* Outcome Assessment (Health Care) / methods*, statistics & numerical data Patient Selection Prospective Studies Risk Assessment / methods* Subarachnoid Hemorrhage / surgery* Treatment Outcome |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Bone mineral density and the risk of peripheral arterial disease in men and women: results from Mr. ...
Next Document: Patient satisfaction after surgery for trigeminal neuralgia--development of a questionnaire.