Document Detail

Redo minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16181865     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Conventional redo coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity as a result of manipulation of patent grafts, mediastinitis, and the presence of pericardial adhesions. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting may be an alternative approach in selected patients. METHODS: From January 1997 to October 2003, 46 patients (mean age, 66 +/- 7.4 years) underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery on the beating heart as a reoperation. Patients after previous cardiac operation by means of median sternotomy without use of the left internal thoracic artery presenting with a significant left anterior descending artery stenosis ("culprit lesion") were included. Predicted mortality was 13.6% (range, 2.4% to 72.8%) as calculated by the logistic Euroscore; ejection fraction was 0.531 (range, 0.14 to 0.81). Surgical results were analyzed for mortality, morbidity, duration of the procedure, hospital stay, and event-free survival. RESULTS: Mean operating time was 103 +/- 34 minutes. There were two in-hospital deaths (4.6%), one for malignant ventricular arrhythmia (Euroscore, 60.9%) and the second as a result of severe gastrointestinal bleeding (Euroscore, 29.2%). One patient (2.3%) was successfully reoperated on because of perianastomotic hematoma using the same approach after 6 days. Patients were discharged after 9.4 +/- 2.6 days. There were no other serious adverse events, no stroke, and no myocardial infarction. During follow-up (37 +/- 21 months, complete in 92.1%), 1 patient experienced angina and 6 patients died. The actuarial 4-year survival is 74.8% (95% confidence interval, 51% to 92%), and the actuarial 4-year event-free survival including freedom from angina, major adverse cardiac events, and reintervention is 81% (95% confidence interval, 54% to 97%). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered as an alternative approach for redo coronary artery bypass grafting in selected patients.
Stephan Jacobs; David Holzhey; Thomas Walther; Volkmar Falk; Friedrich W Mohr
Related Documents :
12400765 - Effect of blood transfusion on long-term survival after cardiac operation.
14681085 - Off-pump surgery: a choice in unstable angina.
19423415 - Intracardiac foreign body in a dog.
19017005 - Simultaneous off-pump coronary artery bypass graft and nephrectomy.
971615 - Left anterior hemiblock of the 2:1 type in the presence of inferior wall myocardial inf...
25022725 - Clinical characteristics of myocardial stunning in acute stroke.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Annals of thoracic surgery     Volume:  80     ISSN:  1552-6259     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Thorac. Surg.     Publication Date:  2005 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-09-26     Completed Date:  2006-09-19     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  15030100R     Medline TA:  Ann Thorac Surg     Country:  Netherlands    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1336-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heartcenter, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Coronary Artery Bypass / methods*,  statistics & numerical data
Follow-Up Studies
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Reoperation / methods,  statistics & numerical data
Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive / methods,  statistics & numerical data
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Neurocognitive functioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneo...
Next Document:  Percutaneous intervention versus coronary bypass surgery for patients older than 70 years of age wit...