Document Detail

Recognition of the health assistant as a delegated clinical role and their inclusion in models of care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23448325     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
AIM: Assistants have been utilised worldwide in healthcare as a means to ensure the provision of adequate and efficient healthcare in the midst of increased pressures on health services for many years. This review aimed to synthesise available qualitative evidence regarding the appropriateness of strategies used to establish the health assistant role as a recognised delegated clinical role and to promote their inclusion in models of care. This review focused on how to make strategies appropriate for health assistants and professionals. Health assistants were defined as those who provide assistance and support to health professionals by whom they are directly or indirectly supervised in all healthcare and health education sectors.
METHODS: A systematic review with meta-synthesis of qualitative studies using meta-aggregation was conducted. Types of participants considered included assistants in healthcare, including nursing and allied health assistants. The phenomena of interest was the appropriateness of strategies used to establish the assistant role as a recognised delegated clinical role and/or to promote their inclusion in models of care. Qualitative research studies including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research and feminist research were considered for inclusion. Electronic searches of multiple databases including MEDLINE, AMED, CINAHL and EMBASE, limited to the English language were conducted during the period of 14 April to 13 May 2011. In addition, grey literature was also searched for, as well as a hand search of relevant journals. Assessment of methodological quality of papers prior to inclusion in the review was performed using a standardised critical appraisal instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI QARI). Data were extracted using the standardised data extraction tool from JBI QARI. Data synthesis using the JBI QARI approach of meta-synthesis by meta-aggregation was performed.
RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 10 included studies, 66 findings were identified that were organised into 11 categories by similarity of meaning. Categories were then aggregated into four synthesised findings: assistants and professionals may have good or difficult inter-professional relationships, which is dependent on a variety of factors, and can thus inform appropriate strategies to include assistants in models of care; professionals and assistants perceive the assistant role and the need for practice change in different ways, whereas the role itself and tasks performed may be influenced by a number of different factors; despite assistants feeling different levels of preparedness for training or the need for training, there are effective training programmes with certain characteristics that can result in positive training outcomes; there are concerns amongst health staff regarding responsibility in models of care using assistants, highlighting the need for appropriate supervision and mentoring of assistants.
CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative meta-synthesis was performed providing a unique perspective on the role of health assistants and strategies used to include them in models of care. These synthesised findings can be used to guide practice in healthcare organisations considering strategies for implementing the assistant role, or where assistants are currently utilised.
Zachary Munn; Catalin Tufanaru; Edoardo Aromataris
Related Documents :
2377725 - The effects of varying fins in müller-lyer and holding illusions.
24326915 - Issues affecting the motivation of nuclear medicine technologists in kuwait.
23920675 - On behavioral decision making and mobile health: a case study.
24118145 - What does personality tell us about working in the bush? temperament and character trai...
24370175 - Use of sanitizing products: safety practices and risk situations.
18254835 - Bodies, mothers and identities: rethinking obesity and the bmi.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of evidence-based healthcare     Volume:  11     ISSN:  1744-1609     ISO Abbreviation:  Int J Evid Based Healthc     Publication Date:  2013 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-03-01     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101247063     Medline TA:  Int J Evid Based Healthc     Country:  Australia    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  3-19     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare © 2013 The Joanna Briggs Institute.
Translation Science, The Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Combined rTMS to the auditory cortex and prefrontal cortex for tinnitus control in patients with dep...
Next Document:  Maintenance of patency of central venous access devices by registered nurses in an acute ambulatory ...