Document Detail

Receipt of recommended radiation therapy among rural and urban cancer patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23042617     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
BACKGROUND: Rural populations have limited geographic access to radiation therapy. The current study examines whether rural patients with cancer are less likely than urban patients with cancer to receive recommended radiation therapy, and identifies factors influencing rural versus urban differences in radiation therapy receipt.
METHODS: The current study included 14,692 rural and 107,834 urban patients with 5 cancer types and stages for which radiation therapy was recommended. The authors used 2000 to 2004 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Limited-Use Data from 8 state-based (California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Utah) and 3 county-based (Atlanta, rural Georgia, and Seattle/Puget Sound) cancer registries. Adjusted radiation therapy receipt rates were calculated by rural versus urban residence overall, for different sociodemographic and cancer characteristics, and for different states based on logistic regression analyses using general estimating equation methods to account for patient clustering by county.
RESULTS: Adjusted rates of radiation therapy receipt were lower for rural (62.1%) than urban (69.1%) patients with breast cancer (P ≤ .001). Among patients with breast cancer, radiation therapy receipt differed more by sociodemographic characteristics (eg, rural patients aged < 50 years had a 67.1% receipt rate, whereas those aged ≥ 80 years had a radiation therapy receipt rate of 29.1%) than rural versus urban residence. Adjusted rates of radiation therapy receipt were similar for rural and urban patients with other cancer types overall (66.1% vs 68.2%; difference not significant), although there were differences between urban and rural patients with regard to radiation therapy receipt for patients with stage IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (66.2% vs 60.7%; P ≤ .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographics, cancer types and stages, and state of residence appear to have a greater influence over receipt of radiation therapy than rural versus urban residence location, suggesting that factors such as social support, receipt of other cancer treatments, and regional practice patterns are important determinants of radiation therapy receipt. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
Laura-Mae Baldwin; Shilpen Patel; C Holly A Andrilla; Roger A Rosenblatt; Mark P Doescher
Related Documents :
17272977 - Positron emission tomography in nonsmall cell lung cancer.
24421077 - Improved survival using intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers:...
16635427 - Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.
8290167 - Satellite pet and lung cancer: a prospective study in surgical patients.
8006497 - Cancer incidence and mortality among african americans.
6221497 - 17-ketosteroid reductase deficiency in an adult patient without gynaecomastia but with ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Cancer     Volume:  118     ISSN:  1097-0142     ISO Abbreviation:  Cancer     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-08     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0374236     Medline TA:  Cancer     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  5100-9     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.
WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Structural features of cholesteryl ester transfer protein: a molecular dynamics simulation study.
Next Document:  Marine prey processed with stone tools by burmese long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis aurea) i...