Document Detail


Reading ability with 3 multifocal intraocular lens models.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17137977     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate reading performance with of 3 types of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) under different lighting conditions based on reading acuity and reading speed tests. SETTING: Augenklinik, Bad Hersfeld, Germany. METHODS: This randomized study comprised 60 cataract patients (120 eyes) randomly assigned to receive an SA40N IOL (AMO) (Group 1, 20 patients), Tecnis ZM001 IOL (AMO) (Group 2, 20 patients), or AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 IOL (Alcon) (Group 3, 20 patients). Pupil size and reading ability at near (visual acuity, reading speed) without correction, with best distance correction, and with best near correction were assessed 6 weeks postoperatively under low-light conditions (6 cd/m(2)) and bright-light conditions (100 cd/m(2)) using the Radner Reading Charts. RESULTS: Six weeks postoperatively, there was no significant difference between groups in pupil size measured under low-light (6 cd/m(2)) or bright-light (100 cd/m(2)) conditions. When assessed under low-light conditions, near visual acuity and reading speed with or without correction were generally better in Group 2 than in Groups 1 and 3; there were no significant difference between Groups 1 and 3. Under bright-light conditions, Groups 2 and 3 performed significantly better than Group 1 and Group 2 performed better than Group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Under bright-light conditions, second-generation multifocal IOLs provided better reading performance than the Array SA40N IOL. However, when tested under low-light conditions, patients with the Tecnis ZM001 IOL had the best reading acuity and reading speed.
Authors:
Werner W Hütz; H Berthold Eckhardt; Bern Röhrig; Roman Grolmus
Related Documents :
23572107 - On and off electroretinography and contrast sensitivity in duchenne muscular dystrophy.
24198367 - Eml1 (cng-modulin) controls light sensitivity in darkness and under continuous illumina...
24110247 - Characterization of noise contaminations in lung sound recordings.
19645307 - Determining the dimensional stability, fracture toughness and flexural strength of ligh...
16712077 - Spontaneous emergence of periodic patterns in a biologically inspired simulation of pho...
24276867 - Con a - peroxidase method: an improved procedure for staining s-glycoproteins in cellul...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of cataract and refractive surgery     Volume:  32     ISSN:  0886-3350     ISO Abbreviation:  J Cataract Refract Surg     Publication Date:  2006 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-12-01     Completed Date:  2007-03-19     Revised Date:  2008-03-13    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8604171     Medline TA:  J Cataract Refract Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2015-21     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Augenklinik Bad Hersfeld, Bad Hersfeld, Germany. werner.huetz@klinikum-hef.de
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Contrast Sensitivity / physiology
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
Lenses, Intraocular*
Light
Middle Aged
Phacoemulsification*
Prospective Studies
Pseudophakia / physiopathology*
Pupil / physiology
Reading*
Visual Acuity / physiology*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):177-8; author reply 178-9   [PMID:  18242420 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Estimation of true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery: ...
Next Document:  Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of vis...