Document Detail


Readability of patient information can be improved.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22549485     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
INTRODUCTION: The number of participants in medical experiments has declined and consent often rests on perilous ground because the participant information sheet (PIS) on which informed consent rests preserves identification with the expert environment. This study explores to which extent research ethics committee (REC) members appreciate this problem.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ten REC applications were subjected to a naïve reading followed by structural analysis to generate themes and subthemes to guide structured REC member focusgroup interviews. This analysis informed a prospective survey where REC members registered terms and phrases posing comprehension barriers to lay receivers.
RESULTS: Main barriers of comprehension were aspects of contents presentation and specialised terminology. Problematic terms centred mainly on epidemiology, design, descriptive and topographic anatomy and physiology, diagnostic procedures and medicines. Contents problems centred on irrelevant and superfluous information and poor presentation.
CONCLUSION: The language, structure and format of the PIS should be improved. Avoiding technical jargon or explaining it when it is used, using more common words when they are available and a clearer structure were identified as potential targets of intervention.
FUNDING: not relevant.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
Authors:
Morten Pilegaard; Hanne Berg Ravn
Related Documents :
22829895 - Generalization of the dynamic clamp concept in neurophysiology and behavior.
12027215 - Microscopy as a tool for renal research.
19379115 - The expectations of two new zealand health services of the role of clinical chairs in n...
15487495 - The changing role of the healthcare assistant.
15529885 - Noncontingent reinforcement, alternative reinforcement, and the matching law: a laborat...
12109725 - Ethical decision making in international nursing research.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Evaluation Studies; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Danish medical journal     Volume:  59     ISSN:  2245-1919     ISO Abbreviation:  Dan Med J     Publication Date:  2012 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-05-02     Completed Date:  2012-08-27     Revised Date:  2012-09-06    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101576205     Medline TA:  Dan Med J     Country:  Denmark    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  A4408     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Business and Social Science, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark. mpi@asb.dk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Communication Barriers*
Comprehension* / ethics
Consent Forms / ethics,  standards*
Denmark
Ethical Review*
Ethics Committees, Research
Focus Groups
Humans
Prospective Studies
Questionnaires
Retrospective Studies
Terminology as Topic*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Aggressive elimination of precancerous lesions of the vocal cords to avoid risk of cancer.
Next Document:  Systematic analysis of ear-nose-throat malpractice complaints may be beneficial for patient safety.