Document Detail

Re-reviewing peer review.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19706869     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
The peer-review process can be improved by having reviewers focus on improving the work rather than simply noting its flaws.
Michael B Yaffe
Related Documents :
9770199 - The role of peer review in internal quality assurance in cytopathology.
18958959 - Religion and spirituality in adjustment following bereavement: an integrative review.
6731359 - Erythrophagocytosis by segmented neutrophils in paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria.
22620969 - Senile systemic amyloidosis: are regional differences real or do they reflect different...
15461699 - Calcium and salinity sensing by the thick ascending limb: a journey from mammals to fis...
9782929 - What we owe the author: rethinking editorial peer review.
23759009 - 'trifecta' after radical prostatectomy: is there a standard definition?
16388179 - Emphysematous pyelonephritis: a consequence of adenocarcinoma of urinary bladder in a n...
23737029 - Brain abnormalities and neurodevelopmental delay in congenital heart disease: systemati...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Editorial     Date:  2009-08-25
Journal Detail:
Title:  Science signaling     Volume:  2     ISSN:  1937-9145     ISO Abbreviation:  Sci Signal     Publication Date:  2009  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-08-26     Completed Date:  2009-11-16     Revised Date:  2011-08-31    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101465400     Medline TA:  Sci Signal     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  eg11     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Helping Behavior
Interprofessional Relations
Peer Review, Research* / methods,  trends
Publishing / standards

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada.
Next Document:  Controlling the number of tooth rows.