Document Detail


Rate of progression and functional significance of aortic root calcification after homograft versus freestyle aortic root replacement.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19752378     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Calcification is an important limitation after aortic root replacement. The aims were to compare the long-term degree and rate of calcification of homografts versus Medtronic freestyle aortic roots to determine the functional consequences and predictive factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixty-six patients were prospectively randomized to undergo homograft versus freestyle total aortic root replacement. Of those, 98 patients underwent a total of 248 electron beam computed tomography studies at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 8 years. All patients underwent yearly clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Calcium scores were measured using Agatston scoring. Mixed effects models demonstrate significantly higher calcium scores in homograft roots than freestyle at 1.5 years (P=0.02), 2 years (P=0.02), and 3 years (P=0.01), with a trend at 1 year (P=0.06) and 8 years (P=0.1). Homograft calcification occurs significantly faster than in freestyle prostheses between 6 months and 3 years after surgery (P=0.02). Calcification occurs at a similar rate thereafter up to 8 years (P=0.3). At 8 years, freedom from aortic valve dysfunction was lower in homografts than freestyle roots (P=0.06). Freedom from reoperation was 93+/-4% in the homograft group versus 100+/-0% in the freestyle group at 8 years (P=0.01). On multivariate analysis, redo surgery (P<0.001), smoking (P<0.01), atrial fibrillation (P=0.001), family history of coronary artery disease (P<0.01), and a degenerative etiology (P=0.02) were predictive of higher calcium scores. CONCLUSIONS: Homograft roots exhibit significantly higher calcium scores than freestyle roots because of faster early calcification.
Authors:
Ismail El-Hamamsy; Mohamed Zaki; Louis M Stevens; Lucy A Clark; Michael Rubens; Giovanni Melina; Magdi H Yacoub
Related Documents :
16750688 - Metabolic syndrome negatively influences disease progression and prognosis in aortic st...
11436048 - The ross procedure in children and young adults: a word of caution.
7283518 - Surgical treatment of aneurysms of the transverse aortic arch: experience with 25 patie...
19879598 - Outcome of the norwood operation in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a 12...
21733178 - Early postoperative cognitive dysfunction and postoperative delirium after anaesthesia ...
22707678 - Ureteroscopic removal of forgotten ureteral stent.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Circulation     Volume:  120     ISSN:  1524-4539     ISO Abbreviation:  Circulation     Publication Date:  2009 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-09-15     Completed Date:  2009-10-06     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0147763     Medline TA:  Circulation     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  S269-75     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Harefield and Royal Brompton NHS Trust, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Aortic Valve / physiopathology,  surgery*
Bioprosthesis / adverse effects*
Calcinosis / etiology*
Calcium / metabolism
Disease Progression
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reoperation
Transplantation, Homologous
Ventricular Function
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
7440-70-2/Calcium

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Differential effects of mechanical and biological stimuli on matrix metalloproteinase promoter activ...
Next Document:  Retrograde ascending aortic dissection during or after thoracic aortic stent graft placement: insigh...