Document Detail

Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23386239     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
INTRODUCTION: : The use of single-incision laparoscopic surgery may represent an improvement over conventional laparoscopic surgery. In recent years, more and more articles have been published demonstrating the feasibility of this approach. Hence, for this reason, we present this randomized prospective study to compare the 2 techniques.
METHODS: : Between September 2009 and December 2010, a total of 184 patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis and indicated for surgery were included in the study, of whom, 91 received an appendectomy via a single umbilical incision and 93 via conventional laparoscopy. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (Murcia). The study was registered on with inscription number NCT0151529. All the operations were performed by the same team of surgeons.
RESULTS: : As far as the demographical results of the study population are concerned, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups for age, weight, sex, body mass index, and removed appendix type. Operating time was longer with the single-port approach: 38.13 ± 13.49 versus 32.12 ± 12.44 minutes (P = 0.02). Significant differences were observed for postoperative pain, which was measured on the visual analog scale, with less pain reported in the single-incision group: 2.76 ± 1.64 versus 3.78 ± 1.76 (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for early and late complications and lengths of hospital stay measured in postoperative hours.
CONCLUSIONS: : The transumbilical single-port approach is seen as a feasible technique for performing appendectomy. It does not increase the rate of complications and represents a possible alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.
Ma Dolores Frutos; Jesus Abrisqueta; Juan Lujan; Israel Abellan; Pascual Parrilla
Related Documents :
23781929 - Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral stone ...
24704319 - Do you need to operate following recovery from complications of pediatric acute sinusitis?
23304579 - Partial splenic embolization as a bridge to total knee replacement for a patient with s...
23074989 - Blue patent lymphography prevents hydrocele after laparoscopic varicocelectomy: 10 year...
24365339 - The neurologic complications of bariatric surgery.
24216529 - The state of the art in the technical performance of lung-sparing operations for malign...
17032319 - Life-threatening sepsis following treatment for haemorrhoids: a systematic review.
21789649 - Laparoscopy within a fast-track program enhances the short-term results after elective ...
15805649 - Management of arteriovenous malformations: a surgical perspective.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of surgery     Volume:  257     ISSN:  1528-1140     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Surg.     Publication Date:  2013 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-02-06     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372354     Medline TA:  Ann Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  413-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
From the Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestivo, Hospital Universitario "Virgen de la Arrixaca," CIBERehd, Murcia, Spain.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Revisiting liver anatomy and terminology of hepatectomies.
Next Document:  Is Competency Assessment at the Specialist Level Achievable? A Study for the National Training Progr...