Document Detail


Randomized blinded trial comparing the cardiopulmonary effects of NOTES with standard laparoscopy in a porcine survival model.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18398643     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Anecdotal reports of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures in patients are emerging. Whether the new procedure is truly less invasive is not known. We compared perioperative cardiopulmonary parameters during NOTES with standard laparoscopy. METHODS: Twelve swine were randomized to transgastric peritoneoscopy with air or diagnostic laparoscopy with CO(2). Cardiopulmonary parameters were invasively monitored. Animals were survived for 14 days. Data were analyzed by an investigator blinded to the procedure performed. Treatments were contrasted on the mean outcome using a repeated measures linear model. RESULTS: All experiments were successfully completed. No gastric leak or peritonitis resulted. Two hundred and fifty cubic centimeters of saline irrigation was adequate to decrease gastric contamination. Respiratory compromise requiring desufflation resulted in two laparoscopy and one endoscopy animal. Mean arterial oxygen saturation remained at baseline for the NOTES group and decreased by 1.5 +/- 1.5% in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.001). Mean arterial pH dropped significantly lower in the laparoscopy versus the NOTES group (-0.09 +/- 0.06 versus -0.05 +/- 0.05, p = 0.01). Mean systolic blood pressure (Sbp) in both groups remained unchanged from the respective baseline (p = 0.45). Mean diastolic blood pressure (Dbp) showed a mean difference of 19 +/- 1.5 mmHg between the groups (p < 0.001), increasing from baseline for the laparoscopy group and decreasing significantly from baseline in the NOTES group (+2.4 +/- 12.5 versus -6.1 +/- 7.0 mmHg, p < 0.001). Mean heart rate increased significantly from baseline in the laparoscopy group compared to the NOTES group (15.0 +/- 23.4 versus 3.8 +/- 19.0 bpm, p = 0.004). A widening pulse pressure resulted in the NOTES group compared to the laparoscopy group (p < 0.001). The mean bladder pressure was 14.6 +/- 8.0 cmH(2)O in the laparoscopy group compared to 7.1 +/- 7.1 cm H(2)O the NOTES group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in measured but not clinically apparent cardiopulmonary parameters were encountered. The difference in insufflation gas, different vagal or catecholamine response may be contributing to these findings.
Authors:
Juliane Bingener; Joel Michalek; John Winston; Kent Van Sickle; Vicky Haines; Wayne Schwesinger; Valerie Lawrence
Related Documents :
3252963 - Factors influencing the development of hypertensive encephalopathy in acute glomerulone...
1434723 - Cognitive outcome after cardiac operations. relationship to intraoperative computerized...
19138483 - Primary isolated subtalar arthrodesis: outcome after 2 to 5 years followup.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial     Date:  2008-04-09
Journal Detail:
Title:  Surgical endoscopy     Volume:  22     ISSN:  1432-2218     ISO Abbreviation:  Surg Endosc     Publication Date:  2008 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-05-13     Completed Date:  2008-07-03     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8806653     Medline TA:  Surg Endosc     Country:  Germany    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1430-4     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery (MA 1281W), Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. bingenercasey.juliane@mayo.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animals
Biopsy
Blood Gas Analysis / methods
Female
Hemodynamics / physiology*
Laparoscopy* / methods,  mortality,  veterinary
Peritoneum / cytology,  metabolism
Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial / methods,  veterinary
Prognosis
Pulmonary Gas Exchange / physiology*
Reproducibility of Results
Survival Rate
Swine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Quality control and educational value of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in a high-volume center.
Next Document:  Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 pa...