Document Detail

Randomized clinical trials presented at the world congress of endourology: how is the quality of reporting?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20874488     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract Purpose: To assess the quality of reporting of randomized conrolled trials (RCTs) presented in abstract form at the annual World Congress of Endourology (WCE) and evaluate their course of subsequent publication. Materials and Methods: All RCTs presented in abstract form at the 2004, 2005, and 2006 WCE annual meetings were identified for review. Quality of reporting was assessed by applying a standardized 14-item evaluation tool based on the Consolidated Standards for the Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement. The subsequent publication rate for the corresponding studies by scanning Medline was also evaluated. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 94 RCTs (3.5% of 2669) were identified for review: 21 in 2004, 36 in 2005, and 37 in 2006. Overall, 45 (47.3% of the total) were subsequently published as a full length indexed manuscript with a mean time to publication of 16.4 ± 13.2 months. Approximately 61 (60%) identified the study design as RCT in the abstract title. None reported the method of randomization. In studies that reported blinding (seven, 11% of 62), five were double blinded and two single blinded. Adverse events were reported in 38% of cases. Only 10% of the abstracts complied fully with more than 10 items according to our CONSORT-based checklist, whereas the majority of them failed to comply with most of the CONSORT requirements. Conclusions: Although representing a small portion of the overall number of abstracts, there has been a steady increase of presentation of RCTs at the WCE over the assessed 3-year period. Most of the time they are recognized as RCTs in the abstract title. When applying the CONSORT criteria, necessary information to assess their methodologic quality is incomplete in some cases.
Riccardo Autorino; Claudio Borges; Michael A White; Fatih Altunrende; Sisto Perdoná; Georges-Pascal Haber; Marco De Sio; Rakesh Khanna; Robert J Stein; Jihad H Kaouk
Related Documents :
19492218 - Evidence-based pain management and palliative care in issue four for 2008 of the cochra...
20825838 - Ed patients: how nonurgent are they? systematic review of the emergency medicine litera...
15966628 - Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
9676668 - Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? a randomized controlled trial...
6218968 - Occupational tropical acne.
23006548 - Wound healing after radiation therapy: review of the literature.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-09-28
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of endourology / Endourological Society     Volume:  24     ISSN:  1557-900X     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Endourol.     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-12-14     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8807503     Medline TA:  J Endourol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2067-73     Citation Subset:  IM    
1 Center for Laparoscopy and Robotics, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute , Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Design, synthesis, and fluorescence lifetime study of benzothiazole derivatives for imaging of amylo...
Next Document:  Genetic Risk Markers for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Portugal: Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha?-308G?>A ...