Document Detail

Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20827667     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
We consider random effects meta-analysis where the outcome variable is the occurrence of some event of interest. The data structures handled are where one has one or more groups in each study, and in each group either the number of subjects with and without the event, or the number of events and the total duration of follow-up is available. Traditionally, the meta-analysis follows the summary measures approach based on the estimates of the outcome measure(s) and the corresponding standard error(s). This approach assumes an approximate normal within-study likelihood and treats the standard errors as known. This approach has several potential disadvantages, such as not accounting for the standard errors being estimated, not accounting for correlation between the estimate and the standard error, the use of an (arbitrary) continuity correction in case of zero events, and the normal approximation being bad in studies with few events. We show that these problems can be overcome in most cases occurring in practice by replacing the approximate normal within-study likelihood by the appropriate exact likelihood. This leads to a generalized linear mixed model that can be fitted in standard statistical software. For instance, in the case of odds ratio meta-analysis, one can use the non-central hypergeometric distribution likelihood leading to mixed-effects conditional logistic regression. For incidence rate ratio meta-analysis, it leads to random effects logistic regression with an offset variable. We also present bivariate and multivariate extensions. We present a number of examples, especially with rare events, among which an example of network meta-analysis.
Theo Stijnen; Taye H Hamza; Pinar Ozdemir
Related Documents :
14557107 - Incorporating prior beliefs about selection bias into the analysis of randomized trials...
11140617 - Evaluating agreement between two analytical methods in clinical chemistry.
19650737 - Evaluation of the united states department of agriculture northeast area-wide tick cont...
25476707 - Are optical distortions used as a cue for material properties of thick transparent obje...
16578777 - Evolutionary principles for polynomial models of frequency-dependent selection.
23026767 - A new scale-free network model for simulating and predicting epidemics.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Statistics in medicine     Volume:  29     ISSN:  1097-0258     ISO Abbreviation:  Stat Med     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-11-30     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8215016     Medline TA:  Stat Med     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  3046-67     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, P. O. Box 9600, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  [Alloplastic cancellous bone replacement and fibrin glue in hand surgery].
Next Document:  First-trimester serum PAPP-A and f?-hCG concentrations and other maternal characteristics to establi...