Document Detail

RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23356699     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Meta-narrative review is one of an emerging menu of new approaches to qualitative and mixed-method systematic review. A meta-narrative review seeks to illuminate a heterogeneous topic area by highlighting the contrasting and complementary ways researchers have studied the same or a similar topic. No previous publication standards exist for the reporting of meta-narrative reviews. This publication standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. The project's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for meta-narrative reviews.
DESIGN: A mixed method study synthesising data between 2011 to 2012 from a literature review, online Delphi panel and feedback from training, workshops and email list.
METHODS: We: (a) collated and summarized existing literature on the principles of good practice in meta-narrative reviews; (b) considered the extent to which these principles had been followed by published reviews, thereby identifying how rigor may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; (c) used a three-round online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of national and international experts in evidence synthesis, meta-narrative reviews, policy, and/or publishing to produce and iteratively refine a draft set of methodological steps, and publication standards; (d) provided real-time support to ongoing meta-narrative reviews and the open-access RAMESES online discussion list so as to capture problems and questions as they arose; and (e) synthesized expert input, evidence review, and real-time problem analysis into a definitive set of standards.
RESULTS: We identified nine published meta-narrative reviews, provided real-time support to four ongoing reviews, and captured questions raised in the RAMESES discussion list. Through analysis and discussion within the project team, we summarized the published literature, and common questions and challenges into briefing materials for the Delphi panel, comprising 33 members. Within three rounds this panel had reached consensus on 20 key publication standards, with an overall response rate of 90%.
CONCLUSIONS: This project used multiple sources to draw together evidence and expertise in meta-narrative reviews. For each item we have included an explanation for why it is important and guidance on how it might be reported. Meta-narrative review is a relatively new method for evidence synthesis and as experience and methodological developments occur, we anticipate that these standards will evolve to reflect further theoretical and methodological developments. We hope that these standards will act as a resource that will contribute to improving the reporting of meta-narrative reviews.
Geoff Wong; Trish Greenhalgh; Gill Westhorp; Jeanette Buckingham; Ray Pawson
Related Documents :
25207239 - Corrigendum: primary purulent pericarditis with cardiac tamponade due to oropharyngeal ...
6204249 - Aphasia and right hemiplegia after cervical myelography with metrizamide. a case report.
12685959 - Galactosemia: a treatable metabolic disorder.
14702129 - Ocular side effects associated with bisphosphonates.
23581649 - Neutrophilic panniculitis developing after treatment of metastatic melanoma with vemura...
1987659 - The synergism of atropine and the cholinesterase reactivator hi-6 in counteracting leth...
1358169 - Beta-thalassaemia minor and porphyria cutanea tarda.
16761709 - Papillary cystadenoma lymphomatosum: case report and review of literature.
22128409 - A rare case of uterine leiomyosarcoma metastasis to the duodenum.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2013-01-29
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of advanced nursing     Volume:  69     ISSN:  1365-2648     ISO Abbreviation:  J Adv Nurs     Publication Date:  2013 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-03-25     Completed Date:  2013-09-09     Revised Date:  2014-10-28    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7609811     Medline TA:  J Adv Nurs     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  987-1004     Citation Subset:  IM; N    
Copyright Information:
© 2013 The Authors.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Meta-Analysis as Topic*
Publishing / standards*
Review Literature as Topic*
Grant Support
10/1008/07//Department of Health; NF-SI-0512-10031//Department of Health

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Saengmaeksan inhibits inflammatory mediators by suppressing RIP-2/caspase-1 activation.
Next Document:  Geographic parthenogenesis and plant-enemy interactions in the common dandelion.