Document Detail

Quality and quantity: an audit of urodynamics practice in relation to newly published National Standards.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21046658     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
OBJECTIVE: To document urodynamic practice in Wales in relation to newly released National Minimum Standards with a view to influencing organisational change.
METHODS: Three questionnaires, evaluating respectively, departmental practice, individual practice and the last 10 studies performed in that department, were sent to all departments performing urodynamics in Wales. Results 19/20 departments responded. Approximately 4,000 studies are performed annually in Wales. Three departments do not perform enough studies annually to meet minimum standards. The minimum standard of 30 studies annually is not met by most centers evaluating neuropathic patients or performing ambulatory tests. Eighty four percent of departments have a clinical lead, one quarter discuss urodynamics in the context of a multi-disciplinary team meeting and occasional audits are performed. Fifty-four staff perform urodynamics, of which 35 (65%) have attended a course. Ability to describe zeroing a transducer was scored out of 6 and respondents scored a median of 3/6. One hundred twenty two out of 168 (72%) of the studies audited asked a clear urodynamics question, but, in 22/168 (13%) this question was not answered. The urodynamics report was written immediately 85% of the time.
CONCLUSION: Centers failing to meet the minimum standards for workload should consider their position in relation to standards and NICE guidance (UKCS, NICE). In particular, departments should give attention to standards described in "Good Urodynamic Practice," establish multi-disciplinary teams for continence management and consider greater centralization of investigations for patients with neuropathies and for ambulatory studies. Most staff attended a course, yet few can describe how to zero transducers. This raises questions about the quality of reporting of some urodynamic studies. Those that are involved in urodynamics should take part in regular CME, relevant audit and consider certification and revalidation. This audit has highlighted significant variations in practice and lends support to the application of nationally agreed standards.
K C Moore; S J Emery; M G Lucas
Related Documents :
18940918 - Clinical decision support tools: personal digital assistant versus online dietary suppl...
7775878 - Study of workload of general medicine specialists working in the health insurance clinics.
2560048 - Standardization of core data for practice annual reports: a pilot study.
21670128 - Sedation in a radiology department - do radiologists follow their own guidelines?
10418648 - Use of anaesthesia simulator: initial impressions of its use in two belgian university ...
24572618 - A practical approach to pain management in patients with cancer and aids.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Neurourology and urodynamics     Volume:  30     ISSN:  1520-6777     ISO Abbreviation:  Neurourol. Urodyn.     Publication Date:  2011 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-12-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8303326     Medline TA:  Neurourol Urodyn     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  38-42     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Overactive bladder in women: does low-count bacteriuria matter? A review.
Next Document:  Safety and efficacy of drug eluting stents compared with bare metal stents for saphenous vein graft ...