Document Detail


Quality measures for primary mental healthcare: a multistakeholder, multijurisdictional Canadian consensus.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20702436     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To develop quality measures using a consensus-based, multistakeholder process to improve delivery of mental health services within primary healthcare settings.
METHODS: A three-stage consensus model culminating in a two-round, modified Delphi postal survey ranking quality measures according to 'actionability,' relevance and overall importance.
PARTICIPANTS: More than 800 people from all 10 provinces and three territories in Canada participated in the study, representing consumers/advocates, clinicians, academics and government decision-makers from regional, provincial and federal levels. A small group with expertise in First Nations and rural-setting health issues was also included, as well as international experts.
RESULTS: The top overall pan-Canadian measure was 'Education about Depression.' 'Actionability' was a key criterion for many of the top 30 measures. Fifty per cent of these measures focused on three major themes: depression, self-harm and access to a broader spectrum of treatment (such as outreach services and psychotherapy). Additional themes included the need for greater collaboration, respectful treatment of patients and families, and improved evaluation of patients. One-way ANOVA results indicated statistically significant differences (p <0.05) between academics, clinicians, consumers and decision-makers on approximately 5% of quality measure ratings. The majority (85% of the 5%) of these differences involved consumer stakeholders.
CONCLUSION: A small set of specific consensus measures were identified through a rigorous, evidence-informed process. These measures can be used for system-wide changes or at the individual practice level. Although these measures have been developed within a Canadian context, the methodology utilised and the measures selected can be adapted elsewhere.
Authors:
Paul Waraich; Renée Sarojini Saklikar; Denise Aubé; Wayne Jones; David Haslam; Karen Hamill
Related Documents :
20160386 - The associations between noise sensitivity, reported physical and mental health, percei...
12400106 - Mental health quality improvement: what about ethics?
3418656 - Orthopaedic waiting list reduction through a review of service provision: the problems ...
16334586 - "a players" or "a positions"? the strategic logic of workforce management.
10515486 - Technology and neurosurgery in developing countries: experience and present situation i...
10091616 - Worsening of levodopa-induced dyskinesias by motor and mental tasks.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2010-08-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  Quality & safety in health care     Volume:  19     ISSN:  1475-3901     ISO Abbreviation:  Qual Saf Health Care     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-12-03     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101136980     Medline TA:  Qual Saf Health Care     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  519-25     Citation Subset:  H    
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health & Addiction, Vancouver, Canada. paul.waraich@gmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  A structured women's preventive health clinic for residents: a quality improvement project designed ...
Next Document:  How "should" we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical p...