Document Detail


Quality and consistency of guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21843224     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2011; 18:880-889 © 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine ABSTRACT: Objectives:  The objective was to provide an overview of the recommendations and quality of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the emergency management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), with a view to informing best practice and improving the consistency of recommendations. Methods:  Electronic searches of health databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO), CPG clearinghouse websites, CPG developer websites, and Internet search engines up to January 2010 were conducted. CPGs were included if 1) they were published in English and freely accessible, 2) their scope included the management of mTBI in the emergency department (ED), 3) the date of last search was within the past 10 years (2000 onward), 4) systematic methods were used to search for evidence, and 5) there was an explicit link between the recommendations and the supporting evidence. Four authors independently assessed the quality of the included CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. The authors extracted and categorized recommendations according to initial clinical assessment, imaging, management, observation, discharge planning, and patient information and follow-up. Results:  The search identified 18 potential CPGs, of which six met the inclusion criteria. The included CPGs varied in scope, target population, size, and guideline development processes. Four CPGs were assessed as "strongly recommended." The majority of CPGs did not provide information about the level of stakeholder involvement (mean AGREE standardized domain score = 57%, range = 25% to 81%), nor did they address the organizational/cost implications of applying the recommendations or provide criteria for monitoring and review of recommendations in practice (mean AGREE standardized domain score = 46.6%, range = 19% to 94%). Recommendations were mostly consistent in terms of the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (adult and pediatric) to assess the level of consciousness, initial assessment criteria, the use of computed tomography (CT) scanning as imaging investigation of choice, and the provision of patient information. The CPGs defined mTBI in a variety of ways and described different rules to determine the need for CT scanning and therefore used different criteria to identify high-risk patients. Conclusions:  Higher-quality CPGs for mTBI are consistent in their recommendations about assessment, imaging, and provision of patient information. There is not, however, an agreed definition of mTBI, and the quality of future CPGs could be improved with better reporting of stakeholder involvement, procedures for updating, and greater consideration of the applicability of the recommendations (cost implications, monitoring procedures). Nevertheless, guideline developers may benefit from adapting existing CPGs to their local context rather than investing in developing CPGs de novo.
Authors:
Emma J Tavender; Marije Bosch; Sally Green; Denise O'Connor; Veronica Pitt; Kate Phillips; Peter Bragge; Russell L Gruen
Related Documents :
10282074 - The impact of prepaid medicine on the fee-for-service practice.
21810804 - Torso vascular trauma at an urban level-i trauma center.
19831094 - Variable practice versus constant practice in the acquisition of wheelchair propulsive ...
21815244 - Spotted wing drosophila infestation of california strawberries and raspberries: economi...
22042144 - The manager and equipment decisions: the capital budget.
17901564 - Camphor induced myocarditis: a case report.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine     Volume:  18     ISSN:  1553-2712     ISO Abbreviation:  Acad Emerg Med     Publication Date:  2011 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-08-16     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9418450     Medline TA:  Acad Emerg Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  880-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
Affiliation:
From the National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital/Department of Surgery (EJT, VP, PB, RLG), and the School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (MB, SG, DO, KP), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Africa's First Emergency Medicine Training Program at the University of Cape Town/Stellenbosch Unive...
Next Document:  Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS): Rationale, Methodology, and Implementation.