Document Detail


Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15492552     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed to assess whether the results of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) equal those of the standard Whipple (SW) operation, especially with respect to duration of surgery, blood loss, hospital stay, delayed gastric emptying (DGE), and survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: PPPD has been associated with a higher incidence of delayed gastric emptying, resulting in a prolonged period of postoperative nasogastric suctioning. Another criticism of the pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with a malignancy is the radicalness of the resection. On the other hand, PPPD might be associated with a shorter operation time and less blood loss. METHODS: A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed in a nonselected series of 170 consecutive patients. All patients with suspicion of pancreatic or periampullary tumor were included and randomized for a SW or a PPPD resection. Data concerning patients' demographics, intraoperative and histologic findings, as well as postoperative mortality, morbidity, and follow-up up to 115 months after discharge, were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences noted in age, sex distribution, tumor localization, and staging. There were no differences in median blood loss and duration of operation between the 2 techniques. DGE was observed equally in the 2 groups. There was only a marginal difference in postoperative weight loss in favor of the standard Whipple procedure. Overall operative mortality was 5.3%. Tumor positive resection margins were found for 12 patients of the SW group and 19 patients of the PPPD group (P < 0.23). Long-term follow-up showed no significant statistical differences in survival between the 2 groups (P < 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The SW and PPPD operations were associated with comparable operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, mortality, morbidity, and incidence of DGE. The overall long-term and disease-free survival was comparable in both groups. Both surgical procedures are equally effective for the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma.
Authors:
Khe T C Tran; Hans G Smeenk; Casper H J van Eijck; Geert Kazemier; Wim C Hop; Jan Willem G Greve; Onno T Terpstra; Jan A Zijlstra; Piet Klinkert; Hans Jeekel
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of surgery     Volume:  240     ISSN:  0003-4932     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Surg.     Publication Date:  2004 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-10-19     Completed Date:  2004-11-23     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372354     Medline TA:  Ann Surg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  738-45     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of General Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adenocarcinoma / mortality,  surgery*
Adult
Aged
Ampulla of Vater*
Blood Loss, Surgical
Common Bile Duct Neoplasms / mortality,  surgery*
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Gastric Emptying
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatic Neoplasms / mortality,  surgery*
Pancreaticoduodenectomy / adverse effects,  methods*
Postoperative Complications
Pylorus / surgery*
Reoperation
Survival Rate
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):746-7   [PMID:  15492553 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Presentation of illness in older adults.
Next Document:  Tissue-engineered small intestine improves recovery after massive small bowel resection.