Document Detail


Pulsatility index variations using two different transit-time flowmeters in coronary artery bypass surgery.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20031439     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: Transit-time flow measurement is widely accepted as an intra-operative assessment in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the two most commonly applied flowmeters, manufactured by MediStim ASA and Transonic Inc., have different default filter settings of 20 and 10 Hz, respectively. This may cause different flow measurements, which will influence the reported results. The aim was to compare pulsatility index (PI) values recorded by the MediStim and Transonic flowmeters in two different clinical settings: (1) analysis of the flow patterns recorded simultaneously by both flowmeters in the same CABGs; and (2) evaluation of flow patterns under different levels of filter settings in the same grafts.
METHODS: Graft flow and PI were measured using the two different flowmeters simultaneously in 19 bypass grafts. Finally, eight grafts were assessed under different digital filter settings at 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 and 100 Hz.
RESULTS: The Transonic flowmeter provided substantially lower PI as compared with the MediStim flowmeter. By increasing the filter setting in the flowmeter, PI increased considerably.
CONCLUSIONS: The Transonic flowmeter displayed a lower PI than the MediStim, due to a lower filter setting. In the Transonic,flow signals are filtered at a lower level, rendering a 'smoother' pattern of flow curves. Because different filter settings determine different PIs, caution must be taken when flow values and flowmeters are compared. The type of flowmeter should be indicated whenever graft flow measurements and derived indexes are provided [corrected].
Authors:
Håvard B Nordgaard; Nicola Vitale; Rafael Astudillo; Attilio Renzulli; Pål Romundstad; Rune Haaverstad
Related Documents :
14621809 - Activation of the alternative pathway of complement is an important component of hypera...
2643139 - Pulsatile masses surrounding vascular prostheses: real-time us color flow imaging.
7041249 - Blood flow and scanning electron microscope study on venous microvascular anastomoses w...
1483119 - Flow visualization analysis in a model of artery-graft anastomosis.
3440729 - Thermodynamic correlates of hot tip laser angioplasty.
19203549 - Hemodialysis graft flow surveillance with prompt corrective interventions improves acce...
11459429 - Cytochrome p450 1a1 (cyp1a1) in blood lymphocytes evidence for catalytic activity and m...
10532779 - Positron-emission tomographic study of human amblyopia with use of defined visual stimuli.
688759 - Reaction types of regional redistribution of blood.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Review     Date:  2009-12-23
Journal Detail:
Title:  European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery     Volume:  37     ISSN:  1873-734X     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg     Publication Date:  2010 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-03     Completed Date:  2011-02-23     Revised Date:  2011-03-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8804069     Medline TA:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg     Country:  Germany    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1063-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway. haavardnordgaard@gmail.com
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Coronary Artery Bypass / methods*
Equipment Design
Flowmeters*
Humans
Monitoring, Intraoperative / instrumentation*
Pulsatile Flow
Saphenous Vein / transplantation
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Vascular Patency
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(3):431; author reply 431-2   [PMID:  20702102 ]
Erratum In:
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Oct;38(4):512

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Strain rate imaging would predict sub-clinical acute rejection in heart transplant recipients.
Next Document:  Pre-clinical whole-body fluorescence imaging: Review of instruments, methods and applications.