Document Detail

Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17242235     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess differences in volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules obtained using different CT slice thicknesses; correlate these differences with nodule size, shape, and margination; and compare measurements generated by two different software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five individual nodules identified on 29 lowdose, unenhanced, MDCT chest examinations were selected for volumetric analysis. Each image data set was reconstructed in three ways (slice thickness/reconstruction interval): 1.25 mm/0.625 mm, 2.5 mm/2 mm, and 5 mm/2.5 mm. Volumetric measurements were made on all 75 nodules at 1.25- and 2.5-mm slice thicknesses and on 57 of 75 nodules at the 5-mm thickness using Volume Analysis software. For 69 of 75 nodules, measurements were obtained on 1.25- and 2.5-mm-thick sections using a different commercially available software system, LN500 R2 software. Volume variability between different slice thicknesses was correlated with nodule diameter, shape, and margination using multiple linear regression. Percent differences between measurements obtained with the two software systems were calculated. Significance of relative volume differences between slice thicknesses and software packages was assessed using a one-sample Student's t-test. RESULTS: Although statistically significant differences in volumes between different section thicknesses were seen only for the tiny nodule size group, many individual nodules showed substantial volume variation. Significant differences were seen in nodule volume variability for smaller nodules (3-10 mm) compared with larger nodules (> or = 11 mm) (p < 0.0001), as well as spiculated compared with smooth nodules, within a single size group (p < 0.05). No effect of nodule shape (round vs elongated) was noted. Statistically significant differences in measurements obtained with the two software systems were seen only with 2.5-mm-thick sections (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: CT slice thickness variation resulted in significant differences in volume measurements for tiny nodules. A spiculated margin was shown to have a significant effect on nodule volume variability within a single size group. Use of different software packages resulted in significant volume measurement differences at the 2.5-mm CT slice thickness.
Myria Petrou; Leslie E Quint; Bin Nan; Laurence H Baker
Related Documents :
9442235 - Assessment of urinary bladder volume in dogs by use of linear ultrasonographic measurem...
22616055 - Two-year evaluation of a variable-thread tapered implant in extraction sites with immed...
21518745 - Cardioverter-defibrillators: a cost or an investment?
22616925 - The effect of prophylaxis method on microtensile bond strength of indirect restorations...
23404005 - Clinical evaluation of conventional cantilever and resin bonded cantilever fixed partia...
6973735 - Long-term changes in corneal endothelium following intraocular lens implantation.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  AJR. American journal of roentgenology     Volume:  188     ISSN:  1546-3141     ISO Abbreviation:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Publication Date:  2007 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-01-23     Completed Date:  2007-02-20     Revised Date:  2008-11-21    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7708173     Medline TA:  AJR Am J Roentgenol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  306-12     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Anatomy, Cross-Sectional / methods*
Artificial Intelligence*
Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*
Information Storage and Retrieval / methods
Lung Neoplasms / radiography
Pattern Recognition, Automated / methods*
Radiographic Image Enhancement / methods
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule / radiography*
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo with proton-density-like contrast: a comprehensive approach to musculosk...
Next Document:  Determination of optimal timing window for pulmonary artery MDCT angiography.