Document Detail


Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) in pulmonary embolism--revisited: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23038695     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis including all the current studies to assess the accuracy of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) in ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of the major databases (Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid PsycInfo, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus) and references of potentially eligible articles and conference proceedings of major emergency medicine organisations through May 2012. We included all original research studies conducted in emergency departments on diagnostic performance of PERC. Two reviewers independently identified the eligible studies and extracted data. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios were calculated using contingency tables. RESULTS: 12 studies including 13 cohorts (three retrospective, 10 prospective) were included, comprising of 14 844 patients from six countries. 12 cohorts were urban and one was rural. Pooled (95% CI) sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio were 0.97 (0.96 to 0.98), 0.22 (0.22 to 0.23), 1.22 (1.16 to 1.29) and 0.17 (0.13 to 0.23), respectively. The pooled (95% CI) diagnostic OR was 7.4 (5.5-9.8). On meta-regression analysis, there was no significant difference between PE prevalence and PERC diagnostic performance (coefficient (SE) of -0.032 (0.022), p=0.173) or on relative diagnostic OR (0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.02). Significant heterogeneity was observed in specificity (I(2)=97.4%) and positive likelihood ratio (I(2)=89.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high sensitivity and low negative likelihood ratio, PERC rule can be used confidently in clinically low probability population settings.
Authors:
Balwinder Singh; Shannon K Mommer; Erwin J Patricia; Soniya S Mascarenhas; Ajay K Parsaik
Related Documents :
2929545 - "spontaneous" coronary artery dissection. the challenge of detection, the enigma of cause.
17933835 - Endovascular treatment of chronic type a dissection.
20189095 - Ultrasound evaluation of early changes in arterial dissection.
15749355 - Fatal and non-fatal bilateral delayed carotid artery dissection after manual strangulat...
10773645 - The carotid compression test for therapeutic occlusion of the internal carotid artery. ...
9515745 - Occlusive and non-occlusive gastrointestinal ischaemia: a clinical review with special ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-10-4
Journal Detail:
Title:  Emergency medicine journal : EMJ     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1472-0213     ISO Abbreviation:  Emerg Med J     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-5     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100963089     Medline TA:  Emerg Med J     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Violence in the emergency department: a multicentre survey of nurses' perceptions in Nigeria.
Next Document:  Relationship between autoantibody clustering and clinical subsets in SLE: cluster and association an...