Document Detail


Provider acceptance, safety, and effectiveness of a computer-based decision tool for colonoscopy preparation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21920302     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: To assess provider acceptance of recommendations by a decision tool that scans the electronic medical record and determines whether sodium phosphate may be taken. In addition, to determine decision tool effects on a composite outcome of colonoscopies canceled, rescheduled, aborted, or repeated sooner than recommended due to preparation (prep) quality; prep quality; colonoscopy duration; and patient satisfaction with and tolerance of the preparation.
METHODS: We used 4 alternating 4-week periods to compare the decision tool with usual care for outpatient colonoscopy. All decision tool decisions were reviewed in real-time by gastroenterology nurses and/or physicians. Patients completed a survey about the prep process. Endoscopists blindly rated prep quality. Colonoscopy duration and findings were recorded.
RESULTS: Of 354 persons in the decision tool group, 4 prep decisions were overridden because of patient preference or prior prep failure, but none for medical reasons. Sodium phosphate was used more frequently in the decision tool group (73% vs. 41%; P<0.01). There was no difference between the decision tool and usual care groups in the composite outcome (26% vs. 30%, respectively; P=0.29), acceptable prep quality (62% vs. 56%; P=0.22), colonoscopy duration (28 vs. 30min; P=0.17), patient satisfaction (P=0.38), or preparation tolerance (P=0.37).
CONCLUSIONS: An electronic medical record-based decision tool can safely and effectively tailor the prep for colonoscopy and may improve colonoscopy efficiency and patient satisfaction.
LIMITATIONS: This study was performed at a single VA medical center and endoscopy unit, relies on the presence of relevant medical conditions and laboratory data in the electronic medical record, and had a higher than expected use of sodium phosphate during usual care.
Authors:
Thomas F Imperiale; Eric A Sherer; Jo Ann D Balph; Jon D Cardwell; Rong Qi
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  International journal of medical informatics     Volume:  80     ISSN:  1872-8243     ISO Abbreviation:  Int J Med Inform     Publication Date:  2011 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-09-16     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9711057     Medline TA:  Int J Med Inform     Country:  Ireland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  726-33     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence for Implementation of Evidence-based Research, Health Services Research and Development, Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States; The Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Uncovering New Functions for MicroRNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Next Document:  Between the sheets: a molecular sieve makes myelin membranes.