Document Detail


Protective ventilation attenuates postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11052430     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain if protective ventilation can attenuate the damaging postoperative pulmonary effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (increases in airway pressure, decreases in lung compliance, and increases in shunt). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft procedure and early extubation. INTERVENTIONS: Thirteen patients received conventional mechanical ventilation (CV; respiratory rate, 8 breaths/min; tidal volume, 12 mL/kg; fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2], 1.0; positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], +5), and 12 patients received protective mechanical ventilation (PV; respiratory rate, 16 breaths/min; tidal volume, 6 mL/kg; FIO2, 1.0; PEEP, +5). Perioperative anesthetic and surgical management were standardized. Various pulmonary parameters were determined twice perioperatively: 10 minutes after intubation and 60 minutes after arrival in the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean postoperative increase in peak airway pressure in group CV was significantly larger than the mean postoperative increase in peak airway pressure in group PV (7.1 v 2.4 cm H2O; p < 0.001). Group CV experienced significant postoperative increases in plateau airway pressure (p = 0.007), but group PV did not (p = 0.644). The mean postoperative decrease in dynamic lung compliance in group CV was significantly larger than the mean postoperative decrease in dynamic lung compliance in group PV (14.9 v 5.5 mL/cm H2O; p = 0.002). Group CV experienced significant postoperative decreases in static lung compliance (p = 0.014), but group PV did not (p = 0.645). Group CV experienced significant postoperative increases in shunt (15.5% to 21.4%; p = 0.021), but group PV did not (18.4% to 21.2%; p = 0.265). CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate that protective ventilation decreases pulmonary damage caused by mechanical ventilation in normal and abnormal lungs. The results of this investigation indicate that protective ventilation may also help attenuate the postoperative pulmonary dysfunction (increases in airway pressure, decreases in lung compliance, and increases in shunt) commonly seen in patients after exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass.
Authors:
M A Chaney; M P Nikolov; B P Blakeman; M Bakhos
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia     Volume:  14     ISSN:  1053-0770     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.     Publication Date:  2000 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2001-02-07     Completed Date:  2001-02-08     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9110208     Medline TA:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  514-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiopulmonary Bypass / adverse effects*
Female
Humans
Lung Diseases / prevention & control*
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications / prevention & control*
Prospective Studies
Respiration, Artificial*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Postcardiopulmonary bypass hypoxemia: a prospective study on incidence, risk factors, and clinical s...
Next Document:  High oxygen concentration exacerbates cardiopulmonary bypass-induced lung injury.